it was 1934
2007-08-14 07:30:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 2
·
3⤊
3⤋
From average global temperature measurements, like this one:
http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/info/warming/
However, it now appears that 2005 was slightly hotter than 1998 (and 2007 will be hotter than 2005). If you're thinking about 1934, it was not even a warm year (as you can see in the graph linked above). See this question for an explanation as to why people who say 1934 was the hottest year are incorrect:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ApKvie5J_.B1pnQlT7eTH0fsy6IX?qid=20070810115452AAYt0LI
2007-08-14 16:40:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dana1981 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
It was based on NASA data.
However, after revisions to their data due to a miscalculation, NASA now holds that the hottest year was 1934. Furthermore, they found that 4 of the 10 hottest years were in the 1930's.
Edit: BlueRidge, it was pretty relevant when it was thought to be 1998, right? I heard that factoid from Global Warming alarmists repeatedly. Apparently they thought that it bore some relevance, at least when it seemed to support their case.
2007-08-14 14:32:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Time to Shrug, Atlas 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
Red herring.
Completely irrelevant whether the "hottest year" was 1998 or 1934.
It is becoming ever clearer to me that our society is wholly incapable of understanding issues, processing data, researching facts.
ONLY THE SENSASIONALISTIC HEADLINES get their attention.
ONLY THE TITILLATING BUZZWORDS make them look.
"Dear Merciful God in Heaven I Will Do Anything That Ye Ask if Ye Will Just Make Your Servants LOOK AT THE DATA."
*The world is getting hotter, year after year after year. FACT.
*The icecaps are melting. FACT.
*This means MORE WATER. FACT.
*Water HOLDS HEAT. FACT.
*THE OCEANS ARE GETTING WARMER. FACT.
*This is contributing directly to bizarre weather patterns, more severe weather. FACT.
*Humans are pumping hundreds of thousands of TONS of CO2 into the atmosphere every DAY. FACT.
*CO2 retains heat. FACT.
*Animal and Plant species are DISAPPEARING AT A RATE ONE THOUSAND TIMES GREATER THAN A MERE 100 YEARS AGO. FACT.
Stop arguing over piddling details and LOOK AT THE 800-POUND GORILLA IN THE ROOM.
2007-08-14 14:45:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
2007-08-14 14:31:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Why, they made it up out of thin air, of course! Just like all the rest of the "The Earth is going to die and it's all the fault of the Evil Humans" nonsense they run around babbling about.
They are some really sad sacks, aren't they?
2007-08-14 14:32:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Fast Eddie B 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
just a guess here, but perhaps: Data....
I would think it comes from a compilation of Average Global Temp, and/or Sea Surface Temp measurements.
Por que?
2007-08-14 14:30:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by outcrop 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
This was on NASS's GISS site. They put this data out before they found a flaw with their calculation.
2007-08-14 14:30:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Dr Jello 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
There is no SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE that the THEORY OF GLOBAL WARMING is man made.
Look up global cooling in wikipedia.
2007-08-14 14:29:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by infobrokernate 6
·
4⤊
4⤋
public records i'm assuming. they really do keep track of it.
2007-08-14 14:29:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋