I mean nothink happened to pauls other children, and they were photographed all the time.
2007-08-14 07:17:09 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
ohh.. hadnt hear that. maybe she is waiting to sell photos later on - to the highest bidder? i mean..she made a pratt of herself on the dance show...i can only assume for money?
paul..he's great..down to earth & a national treasure..has pretty nice & normal kids - i wonder how he ever got stuck with this wife...his last one was absolutely lovely...a moment of madness maybe?!!
2007-08-14 07:24:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The question should be why do people want to see celebrities kids? I mean if I where famous I would be protective of my kids. Look at all these crazy photographers that "do anything: for the picture ..Including endangering people's lives. Look at what happened to princess Diana. ut Heather Mills is probably doing it for the attention. As if stars don't get enough. I personally am tired of hearing about Tom Cruise baby. and all those other famous kids. there kids for pete's sake let them have a childhood. And have them stop dressing there kids in my apartments rent for three months.
2007-08-14 14:24:00 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Beatrice isn't public property if she wants her little girl have privacy then why shouldn't she protect her. Look what happened to Diana with the press media. Would you like a camera shoved in your face every time you go out?
2007-08-14 14:20:33 · answer #3 · answered by annemeiko 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Why should she be thrust into the public eye? Not the best environment to grow up in. And at least they haven't called her some stupid name like most other celebrities. Shows that they just wanted a child together and not some fashion accessory.
2007-08-14 14:26:01 · answer #4 · answered by MEATBALL 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No- i think its her child and she as a mother has a duty to protect her. I wouldn't want images of my kids splashed all over the media. I don't care too much for the woman but every person is entitled to privacy, especially those not old enought to stick up for themselves.
2007-08-14 14:27:34 · answer #5 · answered by Ellie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She is a very mysterious person whose past even Paul had little idea of....shows how love can blind anyone. She is going to be an absolute pain to the McCartneys for years to come. And that she can gain publicity through this stunt shows it.
2007-08-14 14:22:11 · answer #6 · answered by Zombie Birdhouse 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The media are more invasive these days by 1000 times and she is a prime target for paps sadly.
2007-08-14 14:20:07 · answer #7 · answered by Charlene 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Extremely silly. We should all have access to pictures of the childern of celebrities. Your children should be in the spotlight too. We should have a world-wide database of pictures of people's children in order to satisfy the curiosity of celeb-obsessing brits.
2007-08-14 14:21:32 · answer #8 · answered by P.I. Staker 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Do you think you have too much free time on your hands?
Why don't you post your own pictures, you expect other people to allow their children to be photographed, how about you?
Also, can't stand people don't allow you to contact them to respond to their posts. Coward.
2007-08-14 14:20:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
it is a parents to not let their kids to be photographed. it is reasonable, i think, due to all the fuss that is going on with celebrities and the paparazzi. it's her kid. people don't have the right to ogle at them and snap pictures whenever they want to. it can be damaging to the kid.
2007-08-14 14:21:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋