English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

She has WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYY more experience in the US Government than any (viable) Republican candidate. She spent 8 years in the White House, and has been a US senator since then.

(McCain isn't viable, BTW. John McCain is a joke, and won't ever be president.)

You conservitards should face it, Clinton will be president, and your worst nightmare will come true: a vital, happy, relevant America.
I know, awful isn't it?

2007-08-14 07:09:48 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

To Holbrook: Yeahn it would be awful if Hillary turned out like Licoln, wouldn't it? What a sh*tty President he turned out to be.

Moron. Douchebag.

2007-08-14 07:28:12 · update #1

OK, it's a known fact that most of the people who participate in those "who would you vote for" polls never vote anyway. you can just get that conservative spin outta here, dip sticks. i'm smarter than you (not that that's saying much)

2007-08-14 07:36:43 · update #2

24 answers

I think it's hilarious that the same people who say she ran the Administration for 8 of the most prosperous years since Nixon left office also believe she lacks the experience to do the same job again.

And, she'll have Bubba for an advisor, he's been a two term President and the Governor of Arkansas. He probably knows a thing or two about running a large enterprise.

And Stephen I, don't trust too much in polls showing that 56% of Americans wouldn't vote for her. Even in Presidential Years, 64% of Americans don't vote for anybody.

2007-08-14 07:26:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Being in the White House and serving as President are two different things. Plenty of presidential children have been in the White House for 8 years and they have no experience to be president. Hillary has no executive experience that a governor or mayor would have and this is a major requirement of the position of president. No senator (with only senatorial experience) has won the presidency since 1960. People are more abt to want a person with vital executive experience now due to the major budget issues that are being addressed at the federal level thus Hillary is far behind someone like Mitt Romney or Bill Richardson.

2007-08-14 14:36:05 · answer #2 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 1 0

What exactly is the job of the First Lady in the White House? You do know they do not have the Security Clearance to know much...and seeing the sexual expeditions that Bill went on in the White House...I really don't think they were talking much...and what has she done as the Senator from a state she isn't even from? Hilary will divide this country more than Lincoln did...remember all polls say, even the Liberal ones, that over 50% of Americans would not EVER vote for her...

EDIT: If you really knew history, you would know Lincoln had the second lowest approval rating of any "Sitting" President...the one who has the worst is Carter...Lincoln was not considered a "Great" President until the 1950's and 60's...what did Licolin do...let's see...the only good thing he did was free the slaves (which should have happened, but probably would have happened naturally in the end without him...) what else did he do...oh yea...he is responsiable for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans because he did not want the "Union" to split on "his watch"...and by the Constitution, the South had every right to leave...what might be scarier to you, than Hiliary becoming President for us, (Drum Roll) History seeing Bush as a great President for fighting this war on terror...or maybe to you Liberals, it is scarier that we win the war...which is it...

2007-08-14 14:26:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

"I know, awful isn't it?"

No - it'll be GREAT!!! If anyone enjoyed watching White Trash Billy being bruited about they're about to get a dose of deja vu all over again when Queen Hillary the Great starts out for four or eight years of getting slammed EVERY DAY!

Just imagine the never-ending stories whose headlines will go something like this: Bill Seen Slipping Out of [name of famous overweight bimbo goes here] Home at 4AM!

Not to mention the ones like this: Hillary Said to be Tormenting Staff - Class Action Suit Contemplated. And this: Hillary Said to Have the Mouth of a Sailor - Every Other Word is Fuc!, Fuc!, Fuc!.

No, I'm definitely down with having the Queen back in her rightful place on the throne. After all, she's ENTITLED, right? No? Well, if you don't think so, I suggest that you NEVER bring the subject up with her or you'll get your *** plain flat kicked - the girl wears combat boots, in case you haven't noticed!

2007-08-14 14:20:55 · answer #4 · answered by Fast Eddie B 6 · 1 0

8 years playing hostess at the white house doesnt qualify you for service anywhere but the country club. 8 years in the senate is still a newbie to the process. Tommy Thompson has over 20 years of federal service. As far as Clinton being president, recent polls show that 56% of ALL americans would not vote for her. So dont count your chickens before they hatch.

2007-08-14 14:25:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Perhaps you can name one, just one executive position that your girlfriend ever held. She was First Lady (an the first First lady in our history to have been under criminal indictment) which is not an executive position. She's a Senator, which is not an executive position (The last President elected out of the Senate was John Kennedy) and not a very good one at that. No, I disagree. Hillary does not have the experience to be President, and there's a whole lot of reasons to call her character into question. If the Dems nominate Hillary, they are guaranteeing a loss for themselves.

BTW Your name-calling reflects on your level of maturity

2007-08-14 14:19:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Uh, you are making a common liberal mistake of trying to argue with people who are not thinking rationally, but making their minds based on images.

You cannot argue with most of the right, since they are simply wrong about nearly everything. Their arguments are about images: Hilliary is a socialist, hates women who bake cookies, everyone hates her, she will never get elected, she lacks experience in elective office, she is a b**ch, is not relaxed, sounds like a robot, says she invented the internet. Oh wait, that was another one.

I am not sure how to address these type of comments. Perhaps with images of our own. Hilliary stood with the Republicans to fund the Afgan campaign to bomb Bin Laden back to the stone age. She voted to authorize the use of force to get inspectors back into Iraq. She was way ahead of the game when she challenged the liberals in her party to bring a minimum of medical care to each one of us - working or not.

2007-08-14 15:00:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

she pretty much ran the whitehouse for those 8 years anyway...bill couldnt stand it thats why he had an affair LOL. I honestly dont know who to vote for, after the last 8 years with bush as president i dont trust anyone anymore

2007-08-14 14:16:39 · answer #8 · answered by sugarplumfaerie52686 4 · 2 0

Not just conservatives worst nightmare. I think America in general has really had enough of the BushClinton Crime Syndicate.

2007-08-14 14:24:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I don't know if you can call what she has as experience, but I wonder if the people elect Hillary for president are they really going to get her or her husband Bill?

2007-08-14 14:14:47 · answer #10 · answered by buddybrickmason 2 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers