English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=110~1998~1016~2429~2377~2381~3032~885&teams=4~4~4~13~13~13~13~13&te=&cash=

It's the best i've seen. What do you think

2007-08-14 07:09:42 · 11 answers · asked by Fareed E 1 in Sports Basketball

11 answers

That is even more what Minnesota got for KG, Orlando got for T-Mac, and Laker's got for Shaq. You can't seriously think that Chicago will give up their 3 best players for Kobe.

2007-08-16 11:14:41 · answer #1 · answered by JR 6 · 0 0

Why would the Lakers deal three guys signed long-term for four players with whom they'd have to renegotiate next year?

Thomas, Duhon, Deng and Gordon would all be up for new, more expensive contracts next season and would likely all command large enough raises that it's unrealistic to expect that they'd sign all of them. Essentially, the Lakers would be giving up Kobe for Ben Wallace and a shot at signing one of Deng/Gordon.

No way the Lakers make that deal.

2007-08-14 14:14:09 · answer #2 · answered by Craig S 7 · 0 0

I think it's not happening Kobe Bryant will be a Laker, with that trade he's going to the same situation in Chicago, since you're including all viable players going to LA

2007-08-14 14:13:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Chicago wouldn't be interested in sending their 2 best young players (Gordon and Deng) alone for Bryant. Throw in the other 3 and I don't think there is anyway.

2007-08-14 14:14:19 · answer #4 · answered by trojansmatt24 2 · 0 0

I dont think the Bulls would go for it. They are giving up Gordon and Deng, plus their center piece in Wallace. For Kobe and thats about it. Not going to happen.

2007-08-14 14:16:34 · answer #5 · answered by banksd74 5 · 0 0

no,
if you think about it the bulls would be a worse team then the lakers if that trade went down

2007-08-14 14:23:31 · answer #6 · answered by josh 3 · 0 0

kobe wouldn't buy it. it would be just like the lakers now but in chi-town. and personally i'd rather live in LA than the chi.

2007-08-14 14:41:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

no way what's the point of trading kobe for ben ?

2007-08-14 15:26:55 · answer #8 · answered by godog772000 1 · 0 0

seen bettrr

2007-08-14 21:50:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

its not that bad really, but i dont see chicago going for it.

2007-08-14 14:19:27 · answer #10 · answered by what? 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers