Is KARLHEINZ STOCKHAUSEN right when he says that electronic music will eventually replace traditional music?

Question

I doubt he is right. We will always listen to and perform traditional music. And we will always be making music in traditional forms and styles. However, we may one day make this music (in older styles) entirely electronically. That is, we may not use conventional instruments anymore. All the sounds we need can be produced electronically, and you will never know the difference.

What do you think?

Answer 1

Stockhausen was an interesting man... like John Cage.

Nothing in music will ever replace anything. There is always an ebb and flow. A temporary replacement, and then something old becomes retro. The musical pallette will always be added to, but I don't believe any one kind of music will dissappear forever.

Answer 2

It is possible that electronic versions of much traditional and "classical" music will replace human performers when the technology allows it. The cost of human performance is too high.

If the statement attributed to Stockhausen means that electronic compositions will replace the established repertoire, that's extremely doubtful.

Answer 3

Nope. digital song will by no potential have the potential to emulate the nuances of wind or string units. besides, who needs to pass to a stay overall performance corridor and hear mutually as somebody merely pushes a button or 2 on a working laptop or laptop? Seeing an orchestra or a band stay has plenty to do with the human component -- you may ask your self on the musical potential of the contributors of an orchestra who're all working at the same time to offer sound that takes on an entire life of its own, and seeing your renowned band is each bit as plenty approximately because individual or team interior the flesh because it incredibly is approximately listening to the song. desktops merely won't be able to greater healthful that bill.

Answer 4

I would like a reference to his exact quote, please. KS has been misquoted (sometimes maliciously) in the past. I do not doubt he said something to this effect -- he is, after all, full of himself -- but his exact words would be beneficial to my answering this question.