the guy on top of me is right!!
2007-08-14 06:21:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I know, i long for the days when any superstar could appear at any show, i particularly miss seeing Hunter on Smackdown, even more now that that 7 foot tall sand n***** is the world champion, i mean since when did the wwe start giving terrorists the belt? what's next giving Osama Bin laden the US title? I hope Khali gets sent to Guantanamo ! I think WWE should consider amalgamating all three brands, or at least let the title holders appear on any show which would give wider story line options.
colbydouglaswall@yahoo.ca
2007-08-14 13:32:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
well is they had just one show all the people who are trying to make something of theirself in the wwe would never get a chance
2007-08-14 13:39:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mikki Mixx.[morgan.] 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
to get more money, because only one show equals 1 money,
3=3
2007-08-14 13:26:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
to make other people get there time in the ring
if everyone was on one show not many would get ring time
2007-08-14 13:22:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tooooo many peeps
2007-08-14 13:22:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Trinity Sorrows~♥ 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
too much people in one show.And diffrent kind of entertainment.
2007-08-14 13:35:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mr. Undisputed 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Too many people.
2007-08-14 13:20:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Breanne 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because wrestling is as dead as Bryan "Crush" Adams.
2007-08-14 13:24:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
too much for one show.
they wont have to time to have everybody fight.
plus he makes more money this way.
2007-08-14 13:23:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Vicky Z 3
·
1⤊
1⤋