Due to the massive amounts of flood waters overtime?
2007-08-14 04:03:55 · 21 answers · asked by Enigma 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I suppose it is a possibility. I never thought of it before though.
I think the bridge collapse had more to do with an aging, poorly maintained structure.
The mine - hmmm. . .
2007-08-14 04:14:29 · answer #1 · answered by ♥ тнє σяιgιиαℓ gιяℓfяι∂αу ♥ 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No.
Substandard engineering and construction practices along with poor government oversight are the primary contributing factors of failing infrastructure. As for the mines, those collapses are the result of settling/ or shifting of the interior of the mines, causing the ceiling to cave in. Even seismic activity within the earth itself can play a role.
2007-08-14 04:46:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'd say climate change has a small percentage of responsibility. "Weathering" erodes mountains, coastlines, river banks...and it's been going on way before there was a single car or aerosol can.
It's best that everyone understands that bridges and roadways are not intended to be a "once and for all" creation. They require maintenance.
As for a mine...it's an unnatural hole in the earth...it comes with obvious risks.
2007-08-14 04:15:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
No, everybody knows that Bigfoot is responsible for the mine collapse.
The bridge collapse is a result of delayed maintenance and neglect, not associated with either climate change or mythical hairy creatures.
2007-08-14 04:11:23 · answer #4 · answered by ken erestu 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Some, but the bridge collapse is due mostly underfunded and infrequent maintenance of an aging infrastructure, the mine poor working conditions and creating an unnatural void in the earth, and not enough oversight and regulation for either.
2007-08-14 04:21:33 · answer #5 · answered by tiny Valkyrie 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
No I don't think that at all.
Fewer M & M's being carted in trucks going across bridges would decrease the load significantly and therefor the bridges wouldn't wear out so quickly.
2007-08-14 04:08:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
No, i think of it grow to be a structural integrity failure. preliminary investigations element to pointless rigidity led to by ability of shape kit parked on the bridge for prolonged sessions of time on an identical time as the bridge grow to be no longer interior the final shape. i might like an occasion of ways worldwide warming led to the bridge to interrupt down.
2016-10-10 05:09:59 · answer #7 · answered by fauntleroy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bridge collapse, mine collapse have nothing to do with climate changes.
As far as bridges are concerned, nothing lasts forever.
As far as mining is concerned, its always been a risky business.
.
2007-08-14 04:08:01 · answer #8 · answered by vinny_says_relax 7 · 7⤊ 0⤋
Now climate change is causing earthquakes? Good grief, can I officially blame climate change for stubbing my toe?
2007-08-14 04:15:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think it's contributing to democrat party collapse.
2007-08-14 04:10:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋