what makes one source more trustworthy or credible than another? What questions do you ask when evaluating a s

Answer 1

A source that is credible, is a source that has credible statements. So a source with more credible statements, would make it a more credible source. For a source to be credible, it must:

- Make an assertion
- Explain the assertion
- Give evidence to support the assertion

For questions that you can ask yourself in order to evaluate the credibility of a source, check some of the websites below:

Answer 2

Ahaha, this could be a damaging question - we had to learn all approximately it in present day historical past ..yet regrettably i've got forgotten maximum of it. right this is what I submit to in concepts. Credibility of a source is set by: * What replaced into the term it replaced into written in (bcoz the story could have replaced over the years - the older it incredibly is the less sturdy .. i think of - u could want different supplies to back it up. * what's the character of the source? First hand or secondary source - first hand is greater credible * Is the source corroborated by different supplies? -> Do different supplies say an identical/comparable element of your source (backs it up if greater human beings have suggested an identical element) to confirm that your source replaced into credible * Is the source bias? - Is it one sided or does it characterize the two area fairly appropriately? * What replaced into the objective or purpose of the source? - replaced into it written to entertain, teach etc.. A source could get replaced with a view to greater healthful the objective meant. E.G - If it replaced into written for entertainment purposes then the content textile of that source won't all be real and could comprise strains of fabrication with a view to "entertain" its objective marketplace. .. dude, i don't recognize if this replaced into precisely what you have been searching for, yet I did my superb - reliable success