2007-08-14 03:31:24 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
grumpy old man - stop answering my questions. you're a douche.
2007-08-14 03:41:22 · update #1
I don't know about Republican leadership.....that one made me laugh.
2007-08-14 03:42:52 · update #2
I have thought so all along, even though I have no problem with her. I had always believed she was unelectable. My opinion is beginning to shift, though. The Republicans haven't turned up anyone who can withstand a political battle. Romney is wishy-washy and Mormon, Giuliani is pro-gay and for gun control, McCain's position on Iraq has buried him, Gingrich is too tarnished.
I still think the Dems should nominate someone else, but Hilary Rodham-Clinton may be electable against this field.
2007-08-14 05:44:26 · answer #1 · answered by Clint 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Let me tell you. Now that Democrats are having control over congress they are doing lots of foolish things. They are embarransing themselves after they thought they would bring better ideas. Now making stupid decisions in congress that it don't even have sense has change the view of people over the democrats. Clinton is a woman that has been in good positions but after she had said saveral things that many people are against it, she is loosing her votes. Democrats would look more fool if they nominate her. But keep it to yourself
2007-08-14 10:44:01 · answer #2 · answered by the king 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Hillary will be the nominee--no doubt about it. What is foolish is the denial people are having.
Relax--enjoy the ride--it may be bumpy at first but then it will be as smooth as her new Boeing 787 Dreamliner Presidential Transport.
2007-08-14 11:54:26 · answer #3 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
NO! Soneone said, what we need now is republican leadership, I take you are not a US citizen and haven't suffered bush and the republican controlled congress and senate for the last 6 plus years.
2007-08-14 12:28:43 · answer #4 · answered by firewomen 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely
2007-08-14 11:34:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, but keep that to yourself. They also thought Kerry and Gore were good choices. Both were fatally flawed. Kerry, because he was an idiot poser and Gore because of his lap dog association with Willy, a guy he knew better than to let campaign with/for him.
They just set them up to lose which plays in the Republican's favor.
2007-08-14 10:38:29 · answer #6 · answered by The emperor has no clothes 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
In the primaries it doesn't matter but they wold be in the right to nominate her over that racist POS Obama and even that doesn't matter cause she's not going to win anything. People won't even elect her for dog catcher.
2007-08-14 14:51:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have a valid point there, HOWEVER Hillary seems to have some sort of power over the other Dems........hard to define.......and I believe she has them all buffaloed to the point where she will get her way, irregardless of what the other Dems think, feel or want.
2007-08-14 20:12:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hil Clinton is garbage.. all her money comes from corporations and self interests groups... I used to support her but not anymore.. She's not any different than the others..
My vote only goes to either Ron Paul, Mike Gravel or Dennis Kucinech
2007-08-14 10:48:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Yes, they would be but it would lock down a win for the Republicans. In today's world we need Republican leadership.
2007-08-14 10:41:48 · answer #10 · answered by Greg 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋