http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-clintondocs14aug14,1,1086895.story?track=rss&ctrack=1&cset=true
2007-08-14 03:20:18 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
BushInventedGoogle- You got me! HILLARY. How sad!
2007-08-14 03:42:25 · update #1
Good grief, That list would fill a book!
2007-08-14 03:24:07 · answer #1 · answered by booman17 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
She's hiding nothing. Most evidence was destroyed after her goons ransacked Vincent Foster's office while he commited "suicide" and the convenient death by "natural causes" of James McDougal while in custody just as he was going to testify against her pretty much closed the door on any scandal. People close to the Clinton's are afraid to speak out as the body count of their associates has reached close ninety.
And people say the Bush administration is evil and trying to suppress people speaking out. Well, Bush hasn't done such a good job at getting rid of people. Heck, Cheney couldn't kill an old guy with a shot gun. If Hillary had been the shooter, the guy would be dead.
2007-08-14 10:49:09 · answer #2 · answered by patodelamuerte 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Considering a law says she doesn't have to and that that law has been used very much by past presidential libraries including Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Carter, Bush 41 as well as Clinton. So if one thinks Hillary is hiding something one must also wonder what the others are hiding too.
2007-08-14 11:22:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
EVERYTHING! If Hillary were to let out who she really is, she would receive ONLY the VERY RADICAL left votes. She is a rabid socialist. She plays partisan politics to the extreme. She is better at catering her speach to an audience than Kerry was, but the good news is that she cannot side step lies and deceit as well as Bill. She does not have his charisma. I put her chances of being elected at around 5%. If she wins the nomination, she has so many people who hate her that the reps would show up in hoards to vote against her.
2007-08-14 10:27:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Your link didn't work but could be quite a lot seeing as Ms. Clinton chided Obama for being "openly honest about world affairs before an election"
2007-08-14 10:26:22 · answer #5 · answered by Guessses, A.R.T. 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
CONGRATULATIONS!
You have posted the funniest post of the day.
Um, you are aware of the bush regime for the last seven years and the Sacred Cloak of Secrecy?
>>you people slay me, you really do<<
2007-08-14 15:11:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No more than George Bush, Dick Cheney and Alberto Gonzales.
The truth is that our government is filled with liars, cheats and thieves. No one says what the mean or means that they say. We need to get over being Republicans and Democrats, liberals and conservatives and start being Americans.
2007-08-14 10:33:38 · answer #7 · answered by Nancy G 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋
If there was anything to hide, why wouldn't she have just shredded them like normal crooks do.
Most people don't hang on to incriminating papers.
Anyway "locked up" is a far cry from being hidden.
2007-08-14 10:34:16 · answer #8 · answered by Enigma 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Enough to put her behind bars and Billy too.
2007-08-14 10:29:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Just another reason why I won't be voting for her.
2007-08-14 10:24:31 · answer #10 · answered by Still Beautifully Conservative 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋