Studies have shown that the 'Red' states fall behind the 'Blue' states in education and income.
Should the rich states in the North pay more in taxes to distrubute their money to the South to help the poorer states become equal to them? More money will help the 'Red' states build better schools and give better tax incentives to get more higher paying job to the South.
This would be a good thing. Everyone would be equal to each other.
Or are the 'Blue' states just greedy?
2007-08-14
03:08:54
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Dr Jello
7
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
Yes, the Blue states pay more now. But should they pay more? There is so much disparity between the rich and poor, that more needs to be done.
Clearly the Blue states need to do more! Right?
2007-08-14
03:22:06 ·
update #1
i would prefer everyone pay the same percentage, with NO deductions. read "The Fair Tax" by Neil Boortz
2007-08-14 03:17:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Blue Hyena 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
The blue states do pay more in taxes and the red states receive more.
There have been two periods of regional taxation. From the end of the Civil War to the New Deal, the south paid to the north in the form of war reparations. When FDR got elected, the north started paying the south and its been like that ever since - that's a major defining characteristic of the "New Deal."
Its kind of ironic now considering who pays the taxes and who is against the taxes. But I think some of the wealth/income disparity is relative to inflationary policies and cost of living discrepencies. I can live the same lifestyle in FL as CA, it just costs half as much in the red state. If lower income just means lower taxes and lower mortgage/insurance/food costs, what's the downside?
2007-08-14 03:16:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by freedom first 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
you're able to do assorted generalizing and simplifying to declare "the blue states are wealthier," and consequently advise a tax coverage according to the kind of generalization. If something so ridiculous as this ever got here approximately, you will create a race to the backside tax bracket, and all the wealthy could %. up their Land Rovers and pass south the place they did no longer could pay taxes. whenever you create state differentiation like this, despite if it is welfare or taxes, you motivate human beings to pass the place they are going to be waiting to get or shop the main materials.
2016-10-02 07:28:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by devoti 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Blue states already do pay more in taxes. You can look at any of the federal statistics and they show that the "blue states" get approximately 75% of the money they give to the government back and the rest goes to support the red states that pay less due to lower incomes and population.
2007-08-14 03:18:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by gurizaum100 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
One of the things you're skewwing is that even though the income maybe lower in rural areas, the cost of living is lower too. The education stat is usually related to how much money is spent per student and that is not a good number to go by since money doesn't solve all the problems. A good question to you would be, why are so many retirees going to the red states?
2007-08-14 03:18:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by civil_av8r 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Actually,you are right. the blue states DO pay more taxes. Red states pay negative taxes, in other words, the conservative states are basically all on welfare, being paid out by Blue states.
As a blue stater, I say, screw the red states. Let's keep our tax money in our own back yards. I'm sick of carrying those treasonous freeloaders.
Response: The red staters are the ones who are voting against taxes for social issues. Blue states believe we ALL benefit by pooling our resources to raise the standard of living for ALL Americans. But if the redstates are SO opposed to this idea, then why should we continue to spend our tax money on those who vote against us? I say, give them what they want!
2007-08-14 03:18:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Fancy That 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
The blue states fall behind the red states in freedom.
2007-08-14 03:51:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I live in a red state in the south, we don't want or need the blue states money, we're doing just fine without it..our tax rate is much lower than the blue states and we don't have a state income tax
2007-08-14 03:15:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by John 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
No. If the red states think they can provide needed services such as schools, infrastructure, police, fire etc. by cutting taxes than they need to show the blue states how to do that. Most blue staters don't understand voodoo economics and so an example would be great for them to study and learn how its done.
2007-08-14 03:26:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I have a better idea...why don't the greedy, wealthy Republican swine who make money off of the blood and sweat of the underprivileged in this country pay more taxes? That way, it doesn't matter what color a state is you right-wing slime ball...
2007-08-14 04:04:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by ClashMan 2
·
0⤊
2⤋