In New Hampshire Obama says:
"We've got to get the job done there and that requires us to have enough troops so that we're not just air-raiding villages and killing civilians, which is causing enormous pressure over there."
When asked whether he would move U.S. troops out of Iraq to better fight terrorism elsewhere.
Is this guy clueless? He actually thinks we are just carpet bombing civilians over there?
We havn't had an air raid in Afghanistan since we started the war on terror. In the beginning it was to clear the caves. Now we don't need to as we have the equipment and training to accomplish it.
This guy is in no shape to lead our country if he can't even get off his *** and find out facts instead of listening to propaganda.
Holy Crap
2007-08-14 02:10:13 · 6 answers · asked by Q-burt 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
rx77165,
Where did I say ANYTHING about Bush? You have serious issues if thats was all you saw.
2007-08-14 22:18:03 · update #1
Obama is NOT ready to be President.
2007-08-14 02:16:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Not I! Obama hasn't enough experience when it comes to the Iraqi war. WE MUST HAVE OUR TROOPS BROUGHT HOME NOW! As for "carpet bombing" - I think they did that in Vietnam - and we still lost! Obama clueless? Pretty much so ... at 46 he hasn't experienced enough politics yet. He, being a junior senator from Illinois needs to "percolate" a while longer before he attempts to run for president again. His campaign is nothing more than black v. white - and if race is the issue here, those that vote for him are doing nothing more than continuing the business of "slave trading" and today is a good day to stop that insanity!
2007-08-14 02:24:33 · answer #2 · answered by Mary W 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I don't want him as President. Even though I am not voting for her, Hillary Clinton could make a better President than Barack Obama. She accomplished much more when she was a senator and she had 8 years of first hand experience in the White House. Out of the two, Hillary is the more experienced and politically accomplished. Obama was a lousy and mediocre senator.
2007-08-14 02:20:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
First of all, the commander in chief role is a very small role in your acts of President. Secondly, there is an overwhelming majority who do not want our troops there.
Finally, he's right that foreign policy should be used in other ways to combat terror. Terror does not just come from Afghanistan and Iraq--but the world over.
2007-08-14 02:16:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Look at our current president. It's not like it would be the first time the "people" elected a moron to public office.
2007-08-14 02:17:19 · answer #5 · answered by Holy Cow! 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
you think BUSH is any better ...get real
2007-08-14 02:15:54 · answer #6 · answered by HAPA CHIC 6 · 6⤊ 5⤋