I would start Young...and while I'm doing that, I would find a replacement for Delhomme. There are better QB's out there, who will be playing this year. Is Schaub still out there? Harrington? These two are going to have break out years and it would be nice to have them as your back up. Harrington has blown every chance, but yet he still gets them. The Falcons Off. works towards his style of QB. Schaub now has the chance to prove that he is the Man.
Good Luck this year, and don't put too much faith in a Second Year Player...Young has a chance to be good...but INT, will plague him.
2007-08-14 01:36:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by yacko_inc07 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yikes - if those are your QB's, you are already fighting for the middle of the pack - hope you have a STRONG stable of RB's. I would say of those two (who I have avoided like the plague this year), Young, but be ready to play the matchups vs. the weaker D on a given non-bye week. If you have Young going against a team that has a hard time containing, he is the start because he can run and throw on the run as well as just about anyone. Unfortunately, he will be running for his life pretty often, and the Madden Curse is gonna get him. Delhomme will look like Unitas one week, and like Wrecks Grossman (the "bad Rex") the next. If you choose your matchups wisely, you could be okay, but I would look to trade from strength and upgrade at QB. Find an unsuspecting Vince lover and take his QB in exchange. I'm sure you weren't the only one loading him in unless you took him in the top 5 rounds.
2007-08-14 08:37:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by hankshammers 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Young is a very good option if you have a point-per-10-yards-rushing format. It's the same reason that Michael Vick was a top-4 fantasy QB last year: the fact that he misses every receiver by 10 yards (and the pass was dropped on the off-chance he was accurate) is made up for with 70-100 points from rushing yardage over the course of the year. Young still has a long way to go as a passer, but until then he'll hold you over by racking up points on the ground.
And for the people saying "you don't win Super Bowls with running QBs": who cares? You aren't trying to win the Super Bowl, you're trying to accumulate fantasy points. It doesn't matter if they go 0-16 as long as they put up yards and TDs, and Young will do that on the ground.
If you are in a league that de-emphasizes rushing yards, he's a considerably worse option.
2007-08-14 18:08:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sanjay M 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Vince Young
2007-08-14 08:29:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by jtdog1996 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I would definitely start Young. He isn't going to throw up Peyton Manning-type numbers throwing but his legs are going to get you some points. I easily expect him to rush for 700+ yards along with 5-7 TDs. That combined with a solid 2500 yards passing and you'll be fine.
I think that Delhomme is a third string fantasy QB at best.
2007-08-14 08:55:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I would go with Young...he's the focal point of the Titans offense. I had Delhomme last year and he was really incosistant, he could rebound, but I like Young better.
2007-08-14 10:43:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by rufus297 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
do u own the team or u just looking at stats??
I will say this....
....no Super Bowl winning team ever had a QB who was primarily a runner--NEVER!!
THOUGH: Montana, Griese, Staubach, Dawson, Steve Young, Elway, Bradshaw...to name just a few, were all excellent runners and known to run....BUT....their running did not lead their team to the top...it was quarterbacking
ALSO: Namath, Trent Dilfer and Brad Johnson to name just a few could hardly run to save their lives....but, guess what?? They were the starting QB on the winning team
GL
2007-08-14 08:37:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Man of Ideas 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
young untill he gets bit by the madden curse, then you can put delhomme in
2007-08-14 08:30:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by eyesinthedrk 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
young
2007-08-14 08:32:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Zack S 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
start young
2007-08-14 09:34:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by stlrams00 2
·
0⤊
0⤋