Hillary has been playing her campaign so far by the book, probably the one that her husband wrote. She has made very few mistakes and there is no doubt that she is the top contender at this time even though she isn't liked by many of her constituents. She is electable and this is the main prerequisite. I personally feel that she would be a poor president in the White House even with husband Bill standing by in the wings. It is quite possible that something will change in the race and Obama may emerge as first runner. I do not believe that this would be good for America because Obama although smart isn't seasoned enough for the job of president. He needs another ten years before he is ready. The Democrats are pushing Hillary not because they like her but because they feel she is electable. This may change in a few months or after several of the polls will have run. She isn't a shoe in. Not yet.
2007-08-14 01:13:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
She has proven it by being elected to the Senate twice. She is the Dems front runner and after Obama blunders, in the debate on meeting with dictators and in his speech with attacking into Pakistan, she has to nomination. As long a she does does not do something to lose it.
This next election the odds are that the Dem nominee will win. If she is the nominee, she will be the next President.
2007-08-14 01:27:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Chris 5
·
5⤊
1⤋
i think of we are waiting for a woman president, yet as quickly as I see the way human beings like Paris Hilton are glorified, i ask your self in basic terms how quickly we are going to see a women interior the White abode (Hill or no longer). Mrs. Clinton could be a woman yet i've got heard her asserting some exceptionally condescending issues approximately stay at abode mothers. no longer cool. those women have between the toughest jobs interior the worldwide. all of us who might devalue their artwork or the artwork of the different no longer ordinary-working decent American isn't somebody is choose even strolling by ability of the White abode, much less residing interior of its partitions. i'm in touch with women in ability, in basic terms no longer Hill.
2016-10-10 05:00:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary is very electable.. thank-you very much for asking.
However, the Cons are pretty much the only ones going around hoping if they ask this question enough times in many different ways that just maybe some mud might stick.
There is no Republican candidate.... (even if Thompson runs) that is capable of touching her. The disaster is is for the Republicans and their tax breaks for the wealthy and anti-abortion agenda... Hillary will be our next President and a step up from the current mess we're in.
2007-08-14 01:12:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
4⤋
"Strong Republican" is purely hypothetical because so far, there aren't any in the GOP pool of candidates. Therefore, Hillary is totally electable.
2007-08-14 01:39:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I think people are growing tired of business as usual in D.C. and certainly there isn't much love for the "career politicians" who've parasitically attached themselves to Washington, doing nothing more than lying, cheating, stealing, pandering, and scheming all while doing what's in THEIR best interest along the way.
I think many of us have tired of the names Clinton and Bush and Kennedy and all those other names that simply equal "business as usual". Hopefully we'll see some real change and people will turn away from these career politicians in favor of a newer and fresher direction for this country.
2007-08-14 01:29:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bumblebee711 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
No. I just hope she is not picked as the candidate. This will hand the election over to the Republicans for sure.
2007-08-14 01:41:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
A lot of news agencies are starting to say, no she cannot win. NewsMax ran an article yesterday that said she is the best thing that could happen for Republicans in '08.
2007-08-14 01:10:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Can anyone name one thing she has accomplished since entering politics? Beside magically finding "lost" files?
This opportunist doesn't stand a chance, because she lacks principles and changes her position like Billy changed sex partners. Can any of her defenders tell me was she for the war or against the war?
2007-08-14 01:45:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
You must be dreaming, I am going with Hillary all the way, She is a hundred times more intelligent then Bush.
2007-08-14 01:26:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋