The Queen agrees with u he is an ********
2007-08-14 07:42:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The President is not a jackass, and I have no idea what unesscary is supposed to mean. Do you make up words as you go along?
2007-08-14 08:06:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
It doesnt sound like you can form a question, or spell for that matter. My answer wont change your mind anyway. Try to educate yourself and dont listen so much to what media or your religious leaders say as much as paying attention to the factual events and forming your OWN opinion instead of one told to you. You might find by comparing past history and present day events that Bush is more like the little boy with his finger in the dike trying to stop the impending flood.
2007-08-14 06:31:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Stan v 1
·
3⤊
0⤋
Another brilliant thought from another deep thinking leftist. It is so creative that you labeled a conservative as a dummy. It was also creative when you labeled Reagan,Churchill, Mulroney,Thatcher, Nixon and Eisenhower the same way.
Also please learn to use a spell check before questioning someone else's intelligence. It makes your question seem "unesscary"
2007-08-14 06:22:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
No, he is a jackass who happens to be President of the United States.
There was no need for the war in Iraq and the damage it has done to both Iraq and the US.
2007-08-14 06:20:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by sudonym x 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
We shouldnt even be in IRAQ at all we're over there cause he's daddy didnt finish the job we lost tons of AMERICAN SOLDIERS I say we bring them home but he wants them to stay. So I think he should send his children everybody elses kids is there y not those to morons like bush
2007-08-14 14:34:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by KERRI AKA KNIGHT RIDER GIRL RWF4 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
He is just a part of the American dream of insensitivity.
The war was totally unnecessary, and I hope some day all the war victims will arise from their graves and coming knocking the gates of the white house to deliver a memorandum equiring why they had to die.
What do the American people gain out of shedding innocent blood?
2007-08-14 06:55:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kaka M 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
The only thing I'm concerned with at this very second is kicking Sean Penn in the yam sack. The mere image of him and Chavez lovingly embracing leaves me incapable of answering your astutely-worded, well-thought out, and deeply researched question at this time.
2007-08-14 08:45:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bumblebee711 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
speaking for a large amount of WORKING conservatives here who are tired of repeat postings of liberal whine like this, you need to read those little questions that keep popping up when you post that let you know your question has been asked and answered HUNDREDS OF TIMES HERE. that way in the future you wont waste peoples time here with diatribe.
saddam was in the process of ethnicly cleansing the kurds from the face of the earth. we stopped that. without us they would be dead. i thought liberal compassion was all about the underdog...in your case maybe i was wrong.
2007-08-14 06:27:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Great minds discuss ideas.
Average minds discuss events.
Small minds discuss people.
Someone recently told me this, and it REALLY fits this forum TO A TEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-08-14 06:48:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋