my bf has foreskin ?

Question

well i have never had a guy with a foreskin so i uno is it any differnt with a guy without it . ?
plz answer

is it differnt for inercourse from non foreskin ?

Answer 1

A foreskin shouldn't be gross. It only takes less than 10 seconds to pull it back and rub the head when you shower. Mine's always clean.

Here's some information on circumcision (your BF is uncircumcised; some of the facts may surprise you):

Circumcision is a traditionally Jewish and Muslim procedure, although it was introduced and encouraged to the Western, developed world as a way to stop masturbation, especially with the help of Dr. Kellogg. (see link 1) However, although scientific studies have discovered that circumcision harms masturbation by up to over 60% (2), needless to say, it doesn’t completely stop masturbation. Many circumcised guys find it more convenient to use a commercial lubricant as a result (3) since the typically moist foreskin that is like the eyelids is not present to rub the glans with (4).

Most developed nations quickly rejected circumcision after noticing its ineffectiveness against masturbation, and as a result the United States remains the last developed nation doing it to a significant percentage of newborns. (5) This was done as a result of the for-profit American health care system promoting myths about benefits of circumcision (6), such preventing penile cancer (6a, 6b), preventing HIV (6c, 6d) despite the USA being the developed nation with the highest HIV rates and circumcision rates (6e, 5), and preventing STDs (6d, 6f). As a result, circumcision is now brings in hundreds of millions of dollars to doctors and the American health system. (7)

However, circumcision has been becoming less popular as years have passed by. In the 1960s over 90% of guys were circumcised in the USA, now circumcision rates are as low as 14% in some states. (8) More and more parents are discovering that circumcision carries more risks than benefits, and realize that by leaving their sons uncircumcised, they have the choice of choosing what they’d like, since the surgery is irreversible.

Circumcision risks include the loss of sexual pleasure according to multiple studies (2, 9, 10, 11). Those studies take into effect many sensation points, including the foreskin, and they involve many participants. There have been other studies that claim no difference, but they don’t even take into effect the nerve endings on the foreskin, which as seen in one study, are some of the most sensitive points on the penis (10). One study even found an increase in erectile dysfunction rates after circumcision (10a). In another study, it was found that females ended up reaching orgasm with and preferring uncircumcised males in 9 out of 10 cases (10b). In addition, circumcision is extremely painful on newborns (12, 13, 14), and you risk many bad conditions, such as a buried penis when too much foreskin is removed and limits the size of the penis (15), or adhesions or skin bridges that develop from the head to the shaft when the skin heals after the surgery (16), meatal stenosis [occurs in up to 10% of circumcised males!] when the opening of the penis becomes irritated from too much exposure and rubbing and begins to close up (17), and meatal ulcers (18). All those risks are, of course, not including the possibility of having too much skin removed, which can cause discomfort during erections due to lack of skin to allow the penis to expand, and could consequently cause a hairy penis by pulling pubic hair and skin to the shaft. Often a circumcision scar develops around the penis after circumcision. In addition, circumcision has negative effects on breastfeeding. (18)

To conclude, here is a link that describes the anatomy of the foreskin (19) and the development of the foreskin with infants, a link especially helpful for parents (19a). Ultimately, one survey found that although uncircumcised guys are a bit more satisfied percentage-wise, it’s within the margin of error. (20) The only difference is that those unsatisfied uncircumcised guys can simply get circumcised and end up satisfied either way. In addition, in one survey it was found that up to half of circumcised guys expressed concerns on wishing to have had the choice themselves. (21) That, along with the risks and negative effects that are being seen more with the help of the Internet, may be what is bringing down circumcision rates.

Answer 2

Beacher is talking absolute BS.
Some guys out there have a fetish for the look of a circumcised penis and advocate circumcision despite all the evidence against it. Every medical authority in the world now admits that the risks of routine circumcision far outweigh any of the much-debated benefits. Intact male genitals with their foreskin are no more difficult to wash than female genitals and smegma collects in female folds too if it is not washed away. Nobody would suggest cutting away female folds instead of washing them and the same should hold true of male genital folds too.
Human Papiloma Virus (HPV) causes cervical cancer, not foreskins. The study that showed a difference in cancer rates between partners of intact males and circumcised ones has been discredited and even if it were accepted as valid shows a very marginal difference anyway. There is now a vaccine against that virus which is a far better way of controlling it.
You will find it much easier to do a hand job with a foreskin. If you are using condoms (which you should be at this stage) he should slide back his foreskin before putting on a condom. In a monogamous relationship where condoms can be dispensed with the foreskin when forward acts like lube on entry as it slides on itself. Intact penises are often more sensitive than cut ones and you may need to treat it more gently. Ask and he will tell you if things are feeling good or you need to go more gently.

Answer 3

Yes it is different. I have been with other women who have had both and many are surprised at how natural the feeling is with the assistance of the foreskin. Matter of fact most have complained about having to use messy lubes with their cut BF's. The other benefit is that I am able to retract and they can have it either way. Makes it fun to role play.

Answer 4

I would give my right nut to have my foreskin back. I am so furious. Its not fair and extremely jealous

Answer 5

It is great with a natural guy. You don't need lube, it feels more natural. If it was beter when the guy was cut, then the fact that over 85% of the worlds men are uncut ,there would be a lot of unhappy women out there.

Answer 6

Mostly the same, except there are more areas for you to stimulate, and it might provide more stimulation for you too.

My bf has a foreskin too and I like how it slides!

The crap about it being unclean is not true. He needs to wash just like a circumcised guy.

Answer 7

You needn't do anything differently. Women don't feel the difference during intercourse and the foreskin slides backwards and forwards of its own accord with the friction of intercourse. Check it out when you get a chance though... lol

Answer 8

Being uncut feels amazing

Answer 9

I prefer circumcised men.
uncircumcised penis looks and smells gross, plus the head is covered with bacteria that cause STD.

Answer 10

No, it's no different as far as having sex or anything else. You just need to pull the skin down. It's all still fun and games.