montana, now he was lucky. won a state championship in high school, a national championship in college football, and won the super bowl several times. man, how lucky can you get.
-------
but seriously, montana might not be the biggest or the fastest or could throw the farest, but he was the best QB to ever play the game. just his presence gave his team confidence and a never quit attitude. he elevated the play of those around him. when the pressure was on, he delivered.
2007-08-13 16:27:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
hear... i'm a Pats fan yet Manning and Montana at the instant are not puffed up. i'm not into score qbs because of the fact they are all elite and do issues greater suited than the different. as quickly as you're that reliable, in my view, it incredibly is impossible to assert it particularly is greater suited. yet basically considering the fact which you like Brady, he's my sought after, it does not advise Montana is puffed up. the guy replaced into an outstanding qb, and stats mean ****. If we went by stats Manning is plenty greater suited. And to the guy who suggested Brady isn't a reliable qb... come on you don't recognize ****. whilst somebody has gained 3 great bowls... 2 Superbowl mvps... and a MVP then they are an exceedingly proficient qb. He has the excellent triumphing proportion of any qb... ever. All i'm asserting is all 3 are marvelous and there is no could desire to fee them who's the excellent, because of the fact they are all elite.
2016-12-15 14:30:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Montana. And Ryan Leaf was, by far, the unluckiest great player ever.
/sarcasm
2007-08-14 11:20:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sanjay M 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Consistent luck is called skill.
2007-08-13 16:34:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Steel Rain 7
·
1⤊
0⤋