English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I was watching this truth commercial, and it left me speechless....this guy had came up to this man that had cows in a barn or what ever, and he was milking his cows.....this guy came up to him and told him "did you know that drinking milk is more risker, than second hand smoke?"......i dont get it, how is milk bad for you......i thought it was the best thing for you off the side of water....thats like telling me that drinking (clean)water is risker than doing drugs what....i dont get it please explain to me how drinking milk is more risker than second hand smoke.....plzzzzzz !!!!

2007-08-13 14:28:56 · 8 answers · asked by Eileen 1 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

For some of the mean people that answered my questions.....i did watch the whole commercial.....And dont get snappy wit me ......

2007-08-13 14:38:36 · update #1

8 answers

Full cream, or whole milk, has the full milk fat content
Secondhand smoke, although bad for your lungs, isn't right from the source.
The statistic might have defined secondhand smoke as smoke from someone across the room or something such as that, but even if not, whole milk ISN'T good for you, unless somehow you can consume all of the fat content.

2007-08-13 14:44:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Ok I will explain this and no one is going to believe it because they most likely have never step foot into a medical school, or nutrition classes. Luckily for me I paid attention.

Milk scars arteries. It's not the milk itself it's the homogenization process. Low fat milk is good for just not in excess. You don't need more than 6 ounces a day. Anything beyond that is not helping you out nutritionally. Your body can only absorb so much(anymore is just extra fat and calories). Not to mention you need other vitamins to absorb the calcium in milk. So if you are lacking full and proper nutrition most likely you aren't even benefiting from the milk.

There are health risks with everything. Drinking milk is not more hazardous than second hand smoke. But there is truth behind it.

2007-08-13 21:41:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Milk is not more dangerous than second hand smoke. In 1996, the tobacco industry claimed that drinking 1-2 glasses of milk was more dangerous than second hand smoke. The point of these commercials is to expose the false claims that the tobacco companies have made.

2007-08-13 21:36:22 · answer #3 · answered by klynnr_1981 4 · 1 1

If you watched the whole commercial they give you the answer.
Didn't mean to be mean or snippy. In the commercial they tell you That this is what the tobacco companies was trying to do.

2007-08-13 21:32:36 · answer #4 · answered by punch 7 · 0 1

I never saw or heard of this. No, milk isn't a health risk. If it was, we'd have known about it 500 years ago.

2007-08-13 21:33:31 · answer #5 · answered by Derail 7 · 0 1

Hey honey watch the ENTIRE commercial before you try to start rumors. Dang I hate over dramatic people that only listen to half the story.

2007-08-13 21:33:45 · answer #6 · answered by Glinda W 6 · 0 2

that is what they say the cigarette company's reported years ago. It is not the truth. That is what they are saying..the tobacco company lied

2007-08-13 21:32:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Its not omg. Its the stupid tact that bit the tobacoe on the ****. Now they use these stupid comercials are always on god it pisses me off.

2007-08-13 21:34:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers