If we came from ape's , then why did they stop evolving. ( I mean the ape's) think some more.?

Answer 1

This question gets asked so often that some people in Religion & Science have made a drinking game of it; every time someone asks, they take a drink. You may get some answers that say "Swig" or "Gulp" or "Thanks for the excuse to drink". That's what they mean. If you do a search on "still monkies", "still monkeys" and "still apes" you'll get roughly 2 - 3 per day since YA started.

Here is a short answer:

Because they evolved from our common ancestor too. We humans got smarter. The great apes, including chimpanzees, got stronger. They are stronger than us humans. (A 180-pound chimp would wipe the floor with a 180-pound human, even a college wrestler.) I don't expect you to believe that, but if you try hard enough you can understand it.

Here is a little something extra for you, what the Cajuns call "lagniappe", like the free cookie the baker gives the kids when Mom buys a big birthday cake:

Back in 1776, monarchists (Monarchists are people who want to be ruled by a king or queen, not butterfly fanciers.) argued against democracy as a form of government. They said it was absurd to believe that "All men are created equal" because anyone could see men came in different heights, weights and colors. Case closed.

My point is not about democracy. It is about debate. Before you argue about something, you should understand it. If you don't understand it, you'll look foolish. One night on the "Saturday Night Live" TV show, Gilda Radner argued vehemently against the "Deaf Penalty", instead of the "Death Penalty". She looked absurd and we all laughed until the beer came out our noses, which was what she wanted. You don't want people to laugh at you.

In a serious debate, you should understand the other side. Note that I didn't say "Believe". Understanding is not the same as believing. If you were to study 20th century European Political history, you would have to understand several forms of government: communism (the USSR), fascism (Germany, Italy), socialism (Lots of countries), socialist democracy, capitalistic democracy and constitutional monarchy. You would not believe in all of them; you COULD not believe in all of them at once. If you tried, your head would explode. You would, however, have to understand their basic concepts.

If you were to study comparative religion, you would have to understand what Jews, Christians, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs, Taoists and Confucians believe. You would not have to convert to a new religion every week, but you would have to understand the other ones. You would not get very far in your studies if you dismissed all the other ones as "wrong". They believe their path is the right one just as strongly as you believe your path is the right one.

99% of the biologists alive today believe that species evolve, and that the theory of evolution is the best explanation we have for the diversity of life. Christian biologists, Jewish biologists, Muslim biologists, Hindu biologists, Buddhist biologists; Australian, Bolivian and Chinese biologists; 99% of them believe it is the best explanation. Yes, it is only a theory. Planetary motion - the theory that the earth went around the sun, not vice versa - was only a theory for a long time. Some people still don't believe it.

If you are truly curious, ask your minister to give you a short, reasoned explanation of evolution. Tell him you don't want to believe it, of course; you just want to understand it. If he says he can't because it is wrong, he is as ignorant as those monarchists I mentioned above.

Answer 2

The premise is incorrect; no one I know of has suggested humans today evolved from apes. I suggest you read 'Inherit the Wind', the play about the Scopes Monkey Trial (or watch the movie). Of course, would be best if you read the original theory of evolution . . .

Apes today and humans today had a common ancestor. Think of a tree with an almost infinite number of branches. Apes and humans are the end result -- the end tips of branches -- that, if traced back, have a common point. At that common point, there was a split and one branch lead to the apes we see today, another branch lead to the humans we see today. It is the same for all living things (birds and their relationship to the dinosaurs). There were many other "offshoots" and most of these did not survive to the present day.

Answer 3

No. 1: Darwin did not claim humans are descended from apes, but that apes and humans are descended from a common ancestor; and
No. 2: Evolution is a "theory". At no time has proof ever been submitted that one species evolved into another species. There are changes within a species, but probably not the changes claimed by evolutionists/Darwinists.
No. 3: Why did apes quit evolving? As far back as fossil records of the apes go, they have been essentially the same as now.

Answer 4

How about opening a dictionary and finding out what the word evolve actually means instead of inventing your own meaning. EVOLVE:- evolution - development: a process in which something passes by degrees to a different stage (especially a more advanced or mature stage); "the development of his ideas took many years"; "the evolution of Greek civilization"; "the slow development of her skill as a writer" evolution - (biology) the sequence of events involved in the evolutionary development of a species or taxonomic group of organisms

Answer 5

Maybe we came from pigs. Think about it, medicine uses pig skin on burn victims, pig heart valves are used in humans as a substitute, pig enzymes are used in medicine, etc. No ape parts are used on man.
Of course we aren't still evolving as we never did and neither did apes.

Answer 6

They didn't stop evolving after we split off from them. However, the GEDCOM is not complete.

Answer 7

Please look up genealogy in the dictionary. Thank you.

Answer 8

Because we didn't come from apes duh! We come from adam and eve, and they came from Jesus. Don't believe that pycho science sh*t!