You mean that way Bush is 'forced' to stay in office.
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm....I am gonna star this and check back with you in late '08
2007-08-13 13:57:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by ~~∞§arah T∞©~~ 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
The real terrorist will not interfere with the election because they feel the libs will win big. Their move to attack Spain just before the election was great but that type of thing will not happen here because if they attacked us the people would vote for the conservative Republicans to feel more secure. The libs are not known to be very effective in crisis. Look at how they lost Korea and Viet Nam. It takes Republicans to clean up the mess created by Democrats. In a way Bush tried to clean up Clinton's mess in the middle east but did not plan the handling of the population after defeating the tyrant.
2007-08-13 19:35:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by mr conservative 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
those are no longer new ideals. The republican occasion used to uphold a lot of what Ron Paul is speaking approximately. call it the "previous look after" conservatives.. The corporation is very in touch!! no longer approximately Dr. Paul getting the nomination... yet that years of lulling the yank electorate to sleep are in jeopardy whilst human beings commence thinking the dribble being foisted upon the a lot.. learn the subject concerns and in no way give up asking why. you will discover what's important on your ideals then.
2016-10-10 04:23:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Even if there was an attack on election day, it wouldn't derail the elections. Well short of a mass nuclear strike that wiped out every major city. But, and I think we can all agree, the chances of that happening are pretty slim.
2007-08-13 14:45:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If ever an election for your proposed situation to occur, it DEFINITELY would have been the '04 election.
The situation in Iraq was the frontrunner of issues and boy an attack sure would have made Bush look good.
Sadly, the sheeple voted him in......again.
2007-08-13 14:51:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Pretty_Trini_Rican 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Get a grip....We have switched Presidents eithet by death or election many times during war.
Quit reading the wierdo links...
Eg. WW 2 FDR to Truman.
Korea. Truman to Ike.
Viet Nam. Jfk, to LBJ to Nixon.
2007-08-13 14:42:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ken C 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its possible. Though terrorists will be the least of Bush's worries if elections are canceled and he completely pisses off a majority of Americans.
2007-08-13 14:08:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I love the cognitive dissonance you conspiracy theorists seem to harbor. On the one hand you are constantly telling everyone how incompetent this administration is, and then you turn right around and tell everyone that they are the most efficiently run terrorist organization in the world.
Well, which is it. Incompetent or capable of running well planned large scale terrorist operations?
The only thing I am scared of in the coming election is that the loony left will actually put Hillary or Obama up as their candidate.
2007-08-13 14:00:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
I don't think it will hamper the elections if one did occur. It would only give more ideas to the candidates on speeches.
2007-08-13 14:11:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I won't be surpised, in fact I think that's what terrorist Rove resigned for - to plan the next act to keep Bush in power.
2007-08-13 14:50:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by nemesis 4
·
0⤊
1⤋