What chance would they ever have in winning a presidantial race if the parties reps in the electoral collage went their separate ways?
2007-08-13 12:58:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sloan R 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's been a long time since a third political party was viable in a presidential election. Teddy Roosevelt ran for President in the "Bull Moose" party, but lost. If the conservatives in the GOP were to split into two separate parties, both would probably lose on a regular basis to the Democrats. So while there may significant differences between the capitalism conservatives and the moral conservatives as you call them, they both realize that their interests are more closely aligned and better served by being united than by empowering Democrats.
2007-08-13 13:01:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by mcart108 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
psychological conservatives, if there is this variety of situation, are already fleeing the occasion in droves. it particularly is definitely time to take the religion out of the occasion regardless of the undeniable fact that that has to happen. And by the variety the Republicans fought to abolish slavery and presented the federal earnings tax. The republicans have a brilliant history of being imaginative they only stopped whilst they have been taken over by ability of the non secular nuts.
2016-10-10 04:18:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anyone can join the Republican Party. Political philosophy is not a prerequisite. There is no reason to split the party. Members are diverse as can be, in their beliefs.
The word is spelled "conservative." There is no such thing as a "moral conservative."
2007-08-13 12:58:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by regerugged 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Karl Rove
2007-08-13 13:32:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because just as America, we don't have to agree on everything but still accomplish what we see best. Unlike the Dems so when one of your own has opinion outside the guidelines, you are ostracized. Joe Lieberman felt this come down on his head in the elections last year.
2007-08-13 13:03:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jeff E 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Because unlike the DNC, the GOP holds true to itself.
2007-08-13 14:21:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
just vote for Ron Paul and i think he has the guts to do a good job.
2007-08-13 12:57:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush, being neither of those, is the glue holding both sides together.
2007-08-13 12:55:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lily Iris 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
they are called "economic conservatism" and "social conservatism"
and they both exist in the Republican party
2007-08-13 12:57:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋