(like a huge list of words or a lengthy wikipedia article on an arcane topic) somewhere, some time somebody wrote all of this and it must have taken them blimmin ages?
2007-08-13 12:29:14 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
yes I think the same thing
2007-08-13 12:31:02 · answer #1 · answered by bowsgirl1 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually I've never thought of that lol. But now that you mention it wow I'm glad I didn't have to write all that. I wouldn't rely on wikipedia though people can change the stuff.
2007-08-13 12:34:26 · answer #2 · answered by TingTingTing 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unlesss they were very quick and/or knew a lot about their subject. I could turn something out on breeding and raising cockatiels in just a couple hours (if that), complete with references.
However, cars . . . that would take more time and research.
It just depends on the person.
2007-08-13 12:33:05 · answer #3 · answered by Abnormal 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i tend not to read loooooooooonnnggg articles ,they are usually a straight copy from another source.where as the short ones are usually a personal experience of the subject.
2007-08-13 12:37:06 · answer #4 · answered by HaSiCiT Bust A Tie A1 TieBusters 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes! I think I'm sensitive because it takes a long time to get that many words on a page!
2007-08-13 12:31:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yup, I been writing huge, massive emails like that and I'm cream crackered.
2007-08-13 12:38:09 · answer #6 · answered by Kev E 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. And they must have been bored to tears.
My Dad was a technical writer. NOW I realize how he sacrificed to support us.
2007-08-13 12:43:18 · answer #7 · answered by diannegoodwin@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah especially if its on a totally pointless subject. I'm one to talk though. My head is full of useless knowledge.
2007-08-13 12:34:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
So,they enjoyed doing it. Plus,I'm sure a lot of it is plagiarized.
2007-08-13 12:31:27 · answer #9 · answered by Galahad 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yup.
2007-08-13 12:31:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋