e^(1 + lnx)
we know that ln(e) = 1
e^(ln(e) + ln(x) )
product rule: ln a + ln b = ln (ab)
e^(ln(e*x))
e^(ln x) = x
so the answer is e*x
2007-08-13 12:26:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
An alternate method is to realize that adding exponents is just combining a series of values which have been multiplied, e.g.
2^2 * 2^3 = 2(2+3) = 2^5 = 32
So, you can work in reverse for your question:
e^(1 + lnx) = e^1 * e^lnx = e*x (since with e^lnx the e and ln cancel to leave x)
2007-08-13 12:32:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
e^(1 + lnx) = e^1 · e^(lnx) = e*x
Saludos.
2007-08-13 14:14:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by lou h 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
e^ needed -lnx would desire to be written as e^(needed -ln(x) dx) =e^(-needed ln(x) dx) Now, by using factors, needed (lnx)dx = xln(x)-x+C_1, the situation C_1 is the consistent of integration. So e^(-needed ln(x) dx) = e^(-xln(x)-x+C_1)=e^(-xln(x))*e^(-x)*e^C... =C_2x^(-x)*e^(-x), the situation C_2=e^C_1 is a non-0 consistent, and e^(-xln(x))=x^(-x). suited variety is C_2(xe)^(-x).
2016-12-11 19:01:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
e^(1+ln x) = e*e^(ln x) = e*x.
2007-08-13 12:44:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by steiner1745 7
·
0⤊
0⤋