Why did congress vote to authorize the war?

Question

If they knew it was "lies"?

If they were president doesn't the vote mean they would have made the same decision?

Answer 1

Because it would appear that after 9/11 US citizens needed someone to blame, someone to pay, someone to feel their anger (and I suppose that's understandable).
Watching from a different continent it seemed there was a general gnashing of teeth and despite the terrorists coming from Saudi Arabia, the oil companies...sorry, president Bush, selected the weakest of "rogue" states in the middle east to attack; a country which had nothing to do with 9/11.
However, once the ball was set in motion and the call for vengeance so loud, I think Bush could have selected Canada and congress would have authorised it.
It disgusts me slightly that a president and his cronies could use the pain of the citizens he is supposed to protect to line their pockets.

Answer 2

There are very few people who believed that Iraq didn't have weapons of Mass Destruction before the war started.

That being said there were many politicians, that in the end voted for the war, that were pushing to give the inspectors more time before voting to initiate the war.

Clearly more time would have created more doubt about the existence of Weapons. So several people in the administration took it upon themselves to force a vote instead of giving the inspectors more time. Instead of mirroring the doubt that existed in the in the intelligence community they decided to present a case for certainty.

Given the case that was presented by the administration (A case that included not only chemical weapons but also Nuclear weapons) there is no way that anyone in Congress could vote against armed conflict. The administration claimed in its own way that the threat was imminent.

Answer 3

They didn't. They voted to give the President authorization to go to war. And every1 of them that did should be impeached because the Constitution clearly states that Congress has the power to declare war. They took an oath to uphold the Const. and they violated that oath.

Answer 4

purely in case you probably did not word, 1933-80 have been many of the main wealthy years for almost all of human beings in our united states's historic previous. And there have been 3 Republican Presidents in there. Dwight Eisenhower, 1953-sixty one, Richard Nixon, 1969-seventy 5 and Gerald Ford, 1975-seventy seven. of direction, all of them have been Commies by utilising on the instant's standards, yet they have been considered Conservatives lower back interior the day. Nor, is a one occasion device, the only decision. The Republicans might desire to become a third occasion lower back, on a similar time as a extra Populist occasion steps as much as the plate. to grant a stability to the nuttier Dem concepts. reducing our losses in Iraq, that's purely necessary because of the fact Bush refused to settle for the Victory we had lower back in '03, is nicely worth doing by utilising itself account and allow the chips fall the place they might. adequate Republicans are commencing as much as practice keen to place Patriotism over occasion to make it appear as if a probability. interior the tip, the occasion that places united statesa. First will dominate the subsequent 50 years. And, on an excellent sort of the matters, Iraq, loose commerce in any respect expenses, deficit spending, wellness Care, immigration, national secure practices and a bunch of others--it ain't looking like being the Republicans.

Answer 5

Seeing as how Carl Levin was the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee...

http://levin.senate.gov/about/index.html
"Carl Levin is the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, where he has earned a reputation as a strong supporter of our national defense and an effective waste fighter."

-And-

"Senator Levin also serves as the chairman of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. For the last six years, he has directed his staff in a comprehensive money laundering investigation, which has led to strengthened U.S. anti-money laundering. In addition, Levin's work has supported international efforts to detect and stop money laundering and terrorist financing."

-
This dude 'sold the news to democrats' and convinced them to authorize the war.

Answer 6

Bush lied
Americans died.

Answer 7

"yellowcake" and $$$$$$$$$$$