They needed something like a "new Pearle Harbor" to help expedite their agenda, and enable them to justify invading Iraq.
2007-08-13 08:30:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
7⤋
Because the democrats controlled the Senate AND the White house when 95 - 99% of ALL operational elements were put into place. Then for the last bit the republicans did not have enough time to take appropriate action.
Even grade school children can understand that the first year of ANY president's term is serving out the policies and laws and budgeting priorities of the previous administration. It takes a full year to write and pass a budget that a newly sitting president has ANY say in whatsoever.
2007-08-13 08:31:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jeff Engr 6
·
5⤊
2⤋
no person is at fault... The reps show you how to recognize the dems and the dems show you how to recognize reps.. the two way i did not see the two area warning the folk to get out cuz an attack replaced into coming as the two aspects declare that the different occasion replaced into warned before it occurred..i recognize if i heard that i could have been status on the front that morning and telling anybody to get out. does not you have? this finished arguement is stupid.
2016-12-15 13:57:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Is your next question going to be "Why didn't Bush prevent me from wetting the bed?" Should we start a string of silly questions about Carter and Clinton? What's the point? Bush is going to be President until January 2009. Get used to it. Rants like your's aren't going to help a democrat get elected.
2007-08-13 08:43:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Let's see in stead of allowing Donald Rumsfeld to be accepted the dems stalled the vote until, August that year. Than they had to deal with the wall that was put in place by the dems that wouldn't allow agencies to talk to one another. So We followed the rules the dems put in place, and got shafted. And to this day we are still cleaning up Clintion's screw up
2007-08-13 08:36:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
the History Chanel had a very good in depth program called '
"targeted' that gives an in-depth analysis of why it happened and how. if you would take the time to watch this, it explains a lot of why our policies failed to stop this and other acts. i no of no one who would claim that channel is basis in anyway, just presents the actual facts historically.
the blame for failure to recognized the terrorist threat is shared by many, also, you can read history and that will tell you a lot. mostly because it is hard for anyone to believe that some people are that evil.
sadly, we are still under-estimating their commitment to accomplish their goals to our peril.
2007-08-13 08:36:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
Why didn't the Democrats prevent the first World Trade Center attack, or stop Al-Qaeda in the '90s when they had multiple chances?
2007-08-13 08:28:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
3⤋
why didn't The Democratic prevent The Dec.7th 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor?be for you start spreading crap around read your history and know what you are talking about.then run up your WHITE FLAG.
2007-08-13 08:49:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by george 5
·
4⤊
2⤋
It was well documented that a terrorist took flying lessons here in Minneapolis which began long before George W. Bush took office. Fact is many of them were already being trained several years ago.
Date-wise, that puts them in training during Clinton's term. All things aside though, it's not Bill Clinton who we need to blame either.
The bottom line is we as a Country got complacent and haven't watched our borders for far too long. Frankly it's not a Presidential issue half as much as it's a legislative issue by not controlling our borders.
2007-08-13 08:30:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
10⤊
4⤋
<>
you are right about that one, because Republican majority blocked almost every anti-terorrist proposal from Cinton.
2007-08-13 08:36:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by avail_skillz 7
·
3⤊
4⤋
Why didn't the Dem God take the Master Mind when he was "given" to us?
2007-08-13 08:32:06
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋