He spent less money than Brownback and everyone was forecasting a Romney-Brownback finish.
2007-08-13 07:24:04 · 5 answers · asked by Ajay B 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
intelligent man and proved his point.
not a flash like the others
see what happens over the next few weeks.
2007-08-13 07:31:23 · answer #1 · answered by Michael M 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Huckabee places 2nd because of the fact he's conservative and extra customary than applicants which incorporate Tancredo and Hunter. With Giuliani and McCain not partaking and Thompson not yet interior the race, Romney particularly gained accompanied by utilising Huckabee. Ron Paul located 5th because of the fact of his resistance to the conflict, which fits against the evaluations of the final public of Republicans.
2016-10-15 04:53:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He got the second largest percentage of the votes, that means some people in Iowa can not be bought. Imagine that people voting base on the issues and the candidate not the amount spent on advertising. That might just catch on...we can hope. Otherwise in 2012 Bill Gates could run the nation as well as running Cyberspace!
2007-08-13 07:38:25 · answer #3 · answered by cowboy_christian_fellowship 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Maybe this time money won't buy the election. Listen to what Mike Huckabee has to say. You might cast your vote for him if you do.
2007-08-13 07:40:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Funny how they have such perverted sense of rerality! Can anyone honestly picture one of them two stooges running a country?
2007-08-13 07:37:25 · answer #5 · answered by MrNeutral 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋