The Saints.
Don't care about Katrina, either. I just think they are a better team.
2007-08-13 07:27:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mr. Taco 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Saints
2007-08-13 10:11:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by cbtidefan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Saints
2007-08-13 08:06:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Rocky The Fearless 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Saints
2007-08-13 07:26:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by mashinko 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Putting aside the rivalry with the Eagles, I think the Saints are in a much better position than the Cowboys to go to the Super Bowl.
The Saints have the edge in talent and the Cowboys are in transition.
2007-08-13 07:28:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Awesome Bill 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Saints!
2007-08-13 07:26:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Saints!
2007-08-13 07:26:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by simplebutsweet 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cowboys. Saint made them look foolish last year because of Bill Parcells being so stubborn. He knew Payton knew all the plays and personnel and he changed nothing. Now, you have a different coach and the personnel will be used differently. I truly believe this is the Cowboys year. Saint had their opportunity last year and blew it in Chicago.
2007-08-13 09:38:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by cuddleyleo2003 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cowboys
Saints will go too though - They'll be seated on the 45 yard line 12 rows back
2007-08-13 08:05:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmm. Tough question. I am biased as a Cowboys fan but I think the Saints may have a bit more versatility on offense and a little better defense.
2007-08-13 07:29:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by dan b 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I say the Saints, but because I think that they are a better team. Not because I think they "deserve it because of Katrina". What kind of nonsense is that? The only way you deserve to go to the Superbowl, is by winning your games, not because something bad happened in the past. Besides, how many of those players lost homes or family members to Katrina?
2007-08-13 07:32:37
·
answer #11
·
answered by CoolHand 5
·
0⤊
0⤋