Hmmmm. Bill J. Clinton-- B. J. Clinton............
What a name.
2007-08-13 07:20:04 · 25 answers · asked by SEXIEST AVATAR™ is HERE. 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Monica? No wait, she was something else.
2007-08-13 07:22:58 · answer #1 · answered by Brian 7 · 4⤊ 5⤋
If the top of his administration is any indication of what's he's been doing as a citizen, Bush is laying low, preserving quiet and (hopefully) having a no longer ordinary time attending to sleep at night. in the direction of the top, he grow to be doing his ultimate to distance himself from the criminals that made up his administration. someplace alongside the way, Cheney and Rove crossed the line with him. So, as no longer ordinary because it particularly is to have faith, i think of that puppet had a shred of sense of right and incorrect left someplace in there. yet, those days, in spite of he's doing hasn't been very newsworthy. He has a e book popping out. this is approximately it. yet, provide him time. in line with threat with some severe scientific care, he will come returned around. As for bill, he's doing what he can to establish initiatives to help the damaging etc. for my area, i think of he's particularly a glory hound yet, i'm happy he's using his notoriety to hold interest to sturdy motives.
2016-10-10 03:42:34 · answer #2 · answered by jochim 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Alas, Clinton had brains but no integrity or commitment to the American people much less the people of the world.
Now, we face the threat of his wife becoming prez.
She'd be a disaster for exactly the same reason.
2007-08-13 07:27:04 · answer #3 · answered by tom1M 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Considering Bill Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar, I think he really didn't need anyone else
2007-08-13 07:43:33 · answer #4 · answered by MattMan 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Clinton is widely recognized even by (or maybe especially by) his enemies as a brilliant political mind. Even scholastically, he was a Rhodes scholar, and they don't give those out as a legacy.
For all the crass sexual jokes, he has a damn good mind, maybe that's what frightened those crazy Republicans who were doing exactly the same thing Bill was, even while denouncing him on the floor of Congress.
2007-08-13 07:29:22 · answer #5 · answered by justa 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
the guy patriotic and Jen above me shows who are the people so gullible to vote for a Clinton.
If the president is so dumb, then what does that say about Harvard and Yale?
Also how do all you liberals claimed he outsmarted Hillary and the rest of the Dems on congress on the war, he must be smarter than them according to your logic, either that or the Dems are lying so which is it are the Dems liers are unintelligent? I know they wouldn't just take his word, we know what kind of petty, vindictive, and unstrusting peopleb the Dems are.
2007-08-13 07:27:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
I don't think I would waste my time worrying about Clinton. As he hasn't been prez for awhile. I would worry more about what Bush is going to do now that "his brain" has resigned. Just when you didn't think he could get any damn dumber...
2007-08-13 07:37:08 · answer #7 · answered by gone 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Woody Woodpecker
2007-08-13 07:25:22 · answer #8 · answered by Greg 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Um, I am not a fan of Clinton at ALL. However, do not underestimate his or his wife's intelligence. Yes, he was a jerk for doing what he did, then lying about it, no doubt. Don't let that fool you...both he and Hill are extremely sharp and cunning individuals. Scary smart.
2007-08-13 07:27:20 · answer #9 · answered by Maudie 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Terry McAuliffe and that dead guy they found on the park bench in Little Rock, Arkansas.
2007-08-13 07:27:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Madame President Rodham Clinton? Not quite sure...!
2007-08-13 07:24:09 · answer #11 · answered by Rob S 3 · 3⤊ 5⤋