My answer is yes. NFL football players are role models for children that thousands of people lookup to and attempt to replicate. Due to the nature of his actions, i believe he should be let go. Also along with any other player who commits a violent act such as this whether it's against dogs or people is of no consequence.
2007-08-13 06:39:14 · 7 answers · asked by Agnostic Front 6 in Sports ➔ Other - Sports
Heck yes but I am sure that even if he is found guilty he will get away with it like all of the other "celebrities".
2007-08-13 06:44:00 · answer #1 · answered by Elizabeth E 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I neglected it yet stumbled on a link , that's below if all of us else neglected it too. besides lower back to Keith what a pompous a*s i'm Olberman. i think of what he grew to become into attempting to unsuccessfully say is that in case you particularly dislike Vick then you fairly could choose him to serve his time immediately and get out of penal complex the place he won't in any respect be waiting to get a job lower back. And he's " Michael Vick not sufferer " as much as I dislike Keith Olberman i don't think of he grew to become into helping Mr Vick. And it lost something in translation. The comments of his assertion have been terrible so which you're actually not on my own in that. usually speaking however Keith Olberman is such an arrogant SOB , if he might purely communicate TO us and not AT us he might actually be a greater communicator.
2016-10-15 04:47:18 · answer #2 · answered by broderic 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Michael Vick should be fired only if he's found guilty of the charges against him.
Should he be suspended while the trial is going on? IMO, yes he should. It's a distraction for him (he should be allowed the time to concentrate fully on his legal defense); it's a distraction for the team; and it's a distraction for the NFL.
.
2007-08-13 06:53:41 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes there should be a suspension but only if he is found guilty, such as the case with pacman jones. if he can "make it rain and just get suspended then vick should get the same treatment. let the court do their job then point blame and assumptions
2007-08-13 06:45:52 · answer #4 · answered by Johnathan K 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He has been suspended. I don't think he should be fired until he is proven guilty in court. Everyone deserves their day in court. If you were accused of a crime, you would not want to be fired until you were proven guilty. Role model or not it is every Americans' right to get a trial.
2007-08-13 06:44:29 · answer #5 · answered by aj's girl 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think no. it had nothing to do with football..and if he's proven guilty he wont need to be fired, the jail time will kill his career anyways.
2007-08-13 08:21:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
He should be fired and jailed too.
2007-08-13 06:46:28 · answer #7 · answered by mj 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋