Should Micheal Vick be banned from football for life?

Answer 1

Yes, along with anyone else who is convicted of a crime of a violent nature. These players aren't in a job position, they're role-models for children and this type of action should never be acceptable.

Answer 2

If he is found to be guilty of what he is accused of, then yes, he should be banned from returning to the NFL. A lot of young kids look up to athletes - what kind of example does this type of cruel, thoughtless and disgusting action set for them? That it's ok to be nasty to animals and use them for cruel sports, because they have absolutely no feelings whatsoever? No.
If convicted, letting Vick back in the league will only make professional football look like an uncaring and inhumane organisation that is run by idiots that think they are doing something 'fair' despite public opinion and good solid ethics.

Answer 3

For life....No..

Until he settles the court case....yes.


Reasoning....in any job, if you're brought up on charges you will be put on leave, suspended, or transferred pending the outcome of your trial.

Yes, Vick is innocent until proven guilty, but that doesn't mean he should be able to continue his day to day life while his trial is going on. He should be available for trial, testimony, and hearings whenever he is needed. He works around the courts schedule, not the other way around.

In all honesty I hate Michael Vick not only for the dog fighting allegations, but also because he's a talentless thug....However...at least he has the balls to face his trial like a man unlike Pacman Jones who keeps his mouth shut and refuses to testify in a case where he is a primary witness and watched two men get shot.

Answer 4

Michael Vick should be banned from football for life only if he's found guilty of the charges against him.

Should he be suspended while the trial is going on? IMO, yes he should. It's a distraction for him (he should be allowed the time to concentrate fully on his legal defense); it's a distraction for the team; and it's a distraction for the NFL.
.

Answer 5

I don't think so. Legally, I don't see how the league could take such a drastic measure. However, if Vick does jail time, we may not see him on football field again. He would probably just go into self imposed exile.

Answer 6

He didn't get convicted of anything....now...should he be found guilty...he'd probably not ever play in the NFL again because of image issues...can't exactly have a felon who beat and tortured dogs playing for you right?

But until he's found guilty of anything, people need to lay off on the guy and let the courts decide what's going to happen to him. Wouldn't you want that fair process first? Exactly...

Answer 7

he hasnt been convicted of anything yett, so no

i think the real issue here is that he SAID he didnt fund the fighting, but if he did, thats the biggest problem, at least form the NFL's p.o.v.

it looks like hes done for this year, but if hes found guilty, then yea he'll be done from football, probably by choice than by forcible ban

Answer 8

Hey,
I easily got for free Pacman Original here: http://bitly.com/1vX0wxu

no surveys, no scams, just the full game!
If you want to play a game that would just make you crave for more, start playing Pacman Original today. You sure would have loads and loads of fun!
You should definitely try it

Answer 9

Not if he's not guilty. If he is, he should be a stand up guy and say he is, but of course that's never going to happen. If convicted, he should be imprisoned for a long time. Good thing there's no rehab to run to for torturing animals.

Answer 10

Yes. He is done playing in the NFL, which is a good thing because he was a lousy QB and was unwilling to switch positions anyways. No big loss.