In a 12-team league, I'd give your team an 8.5. I think too many of the other posts underestimate your squad.
Marc Bulger is an excellent starting QB given the wide-open offense favored by the Rams. He'll get his share of TDs, even with Jackson getting so many touches. Leinart is more than capable as a backup, and has two awesome targets in Boldin and Fitzgerald.
Your top two backs are good. I'm assuming you took Gore seventh, and that's a great choice at that spot. He'll have a good season. Maroney is now the man in that backfield, so he'll score more than he did last season even with the Pats throwing a lot.
Your receivers are slightly thin after the top two of Wayne and Brown, but you don't need that much depth anyway. Wayne will have his typical strong season, and I think Brown will fluorish with McNabb back and healthy. With Stallworth gone, Brown is now the #1 guy and should put up numbers to reflect that. Your TE is a good one, Gostkowski should get plenty of scoring chances, and Carolina's D will be strong as long as they stay healthy.
Without seeing the other teams in your league, I'd guess that you've got a good shot at going far.
2007-08-13 03:23:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Craig S 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Vernon Davis is good but not great and with McNabb injured who will throw to Reggie Brown. Put Vincent Jackson in instead of Brown. Gostkowski?
2007-08-13 04:12:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Matty V 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
lienart is weak, you need a better backup which shouldn't be 2 hard cause lienart is 1 of the worst. 1 week b4 the season pickup the winner of the starting battle ( if there available) jamarcus russel or daunte caulpepper ( they're both available in my league) and ur WR. suck but othere than that not bad and good call on Brandon Jackson. GO PACKERS
2007-08-13 03:13:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you could have done better. I would rank it a 6+. I'm not sure who was available in your draft at 7th but if you look at the top three prospects in each of the categories I think that you could have done better. For example: QB: Manning, Palmer, Brady. RB: Bush, Tomlinson, Addai. WR: Harrison, Wayne, C. Johnson(cincy). I left the TE's and Defenses out but see where I'm going here? Think of it as a business instead of where your loyalties run unles not winning isn't a factor, then all is good.
2007-08-13 03:25:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Xam 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Frank Gore is a good 7th pick. QB's are a little meh for my taste but they aren't the most important position. I like your wides and defense. You could do well. 6 or 7.
I pick 7th in mine next week.
2007-08-13 03:13:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Edub 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
your bench sucks and tampa bay's protection is suspect. you forget approximately they play interior the nfc south with carolina and atlanta. look on the offensive gamers on those group. there's a superb type of things they're going to renounce interior the those video games. none of your bench gamers are going to do something for you. according to probability bledsoe. for the main area they are the two coming off injuries or under performers. so your superb case situation is to desire none of your starters get harm. mcnabb performs interior the nfc critical and doesnt have reliable receivers or a first rate back. boldin is super, moss replaced into super, mason wont provide u super numbers. johnson is super. bush would be super. witten performs in dallas have been terry glenn gets lots of the balls and stats. so the starters look extraordinarily reliable.
2016-12-15 13:41:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by trickey 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You did well. Gore and Maroney are two stud runners, Bulger is a top 5 QB and I think Leinart is underrated.
2007-08-13 03:29:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by borg_of_earth 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
QBs are outstanding, RBs may be weak after Gore and WRs have potential. Give it a solid 7.
2007-08-13 03:11:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Zombie Birdhouse 7
·
0⤊
1⤋