I think they are guilty, I think that one of them hit the girl and killed her, I dont't think they meant to kill her but as no adult should hit a child they would be charged with murder, so they went to dine leaving the children alone, just to have an alibi and make all the abduction story up.What do you think?.
2007-08-12 22:22:53 · 36 answers · asked by juli 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
You are entitled to your opinion and that does not make you sick.
I'm surprised that their Nanny back in England has not been approached by the media for an insight into their daily life and their attitude to the children before the disappearance of Maddie.
It's as though the Media are portraying them as "Parents of the Year", when they are in fact guilty of neglect.
2007-08-13 03:12:11 · answer #1 · answered by st.abbs 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
"seems really strange that now they want to know if she is dead or not, only the other day they couldn't deal with the thought of heaaring she was dead"
Hopalong, there is no inconsistency here, the first is about not giving up hope, the second is in response to the police saying they no longer think she was abducted but was killed in the apartment.
I could be wrong about their guilt, we are used to all the information being in the public domain so naturaly thre are unanswered questions. But if they are guilty I couldn't find words to describe even if it was an accident because of what they have done since. In fact I can find a word, evil and I would expect to see evidence of it from their past.
2007-08-12 22:45:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Aye, nicely, extraordinarily lots everybody in the worldwide aside from the saddos who proceed to hawk their 'naughty McCanns' conspiracy theories on right here would not provide a toss anymore. that's historic historic past and if that baby isn't lifeless i'm going to be completely surprised. confident she could nonetheless be alive, however the percentages are lots better for a nicely hidden corpse. i'm going to additionally be completely surprised if the mum and dad have been in charge in any way. because of the fact this crime has been investigated by way of Portugese and British police and hey presto, aside from one e book by way of a Portugese copper on the make, there is no info to cost the mum and dad with something different than consistent with danger overlook. and that's barely consistent with danger.
2016-11-12 04:39:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
last week someone asked about the Joanne lees / peter falconio case.
I was one of the people who initially thought that Joanne lees was guilty, because of the outlandish facts (which eventually turned out to be true)
the difference between myself, at that time, and this nasty opening poster, is that I would not have invented 'facts' to fill in the missing pieces and then spread my ideas over a public forum.
one of the earlier answers called her a 'f*ckwit columbo'
I think a better title would be 'Juli:CSI' (completely sick individual)
2007-08-12 23:04:21 · answer #4 · answered by Vinni and beer 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think speculation is really unnecessary. I think that many people who have had children abducted have sufered at the hands of people like yourself by being the first to be blamed. The parents did it. There was a woman in Australia who had a three day old son and had got in her car to get milk. She was abducted and killed. Her husband and father of the boy was hounded by the press that he did it - it turns out we ahd a serial killer who was out and about and killed three women in a week. THe poor spouse of the dead woman was 100% innocent but amidst his grief had to defend himself - just awful.
Please restrict your sleuthing to yourself and not bring up upsetting memories for people by speculating.
2007-08-12 22:44:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
And what evidence do you have to back up your theory? I have to say I am absolutley disguested by your question. It is totally ridiculous and almost laughable really! You clearly have way too much spare time and are clutching onto the anti-McCann bandwagon with both hands. Why don't you present your theory to the police? I'm sure that won't have crossed their minds at all!!
2007-08-12 23:04:08 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I think the only thing they are guilty of is not looking after the welfare of their children by going out and leaving them alone. Jumping from this to accusations of murder is just what the tabloid t.v. that is Sky News wants to talk about and create a mass hysteria. This is Diana-gate all over again. Leave the couple alone to grieve their loss and find their daughter. You should be ashamed of yourself.
2007-08-12 22:37:24 · answer #7 · answered by Painey 2 · 5⤊ 4⤋
Speculation
2007-08-12 22:55:09 · answer #8 · answered by Saucy B 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I think that the press and the public are so desperate to place blame they are jus pointin the finger at any1. Why cant people accept that this might actally be a genuine case and stop spreading rumours they no1 can proove. they are goin thru hell out there and the last thing they need is this kind of publicity, they need to know that people are behind them!!!!!!
2007-08-12 22:43:09 · answer #9 · answered by dopyjazz 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Ok here is my theory.
I do not know what happened to Madeleine cos the mystery has not being solved yet.
I only know the parents for neglecting their own children before that they were unheard of.
2007-08-12 22:32:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 1⤋