actually, precedents ARE set by the presidents, and ARE followed by the successors.
the same is true in LAW. when a precedent is set under a certain court ruling, it can and usually DOES have effect on other similar cases.
interesting, isn't it? that your beloved clinton was no doubt following behavior expounded for him by previous presidents, and in turn, he further expanded the boundaries a little more for his successor, who will likely set out some more niceties for his follower.......
2007-08-12 19:10:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
How many damn times does this need to be explained?
Despite bringing about the lowest unemployment rate in modern times, the lowest inflation in 30 years, the highest home ownership in the country's history and dropping crime rates but because he got a ******** he is considered the embodiment of evil. Bush sends thousands to their deaths while pushing the gap between the rich and the poor and raping the rights of the average american and he's still in office. It's an outrage!
2007-08-13 06:06:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Just keep breathin' 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Strange how Billy Boy was impeached for getting a BJ but bush gets away with starting a war through lies.Seems like with each new prez comes new idiotic platforms and reforms and now at the border 30 or more forms in triplicate just to get across the worlds longest open?...border.Can the people just shoot the future politicians now for screwing the country up as a pre emptive strike?
sorry didn't mean to answer with a question.
2007-08-13 02:09:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by cosmo_02 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
You know you are on shaky ground when you have to defend the meaning of is, is, but hey I voted for Bill twice and was happy to do so, but I am still waiting for the recount in the 2000 election to see who I voted for in Florida
2007-08-13 02:35:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by saywhat 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
True.
Bill Clinton has become the moral compass of the Republican party over the past 7 years.
2007-08-13 02:32:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
YOU MISSED THE POINT ENTIRELY. I AM CERTAINLY NOT AND NEVER WILL BE AN APOLOGIST. THE IDEA HERE IS THAT LIBERALS, AS CLINTON HAVE NO RESPONSIBLITY, ETHICS OR SHAME AND COMPARED TO THAT, RU PAUL WOULD MAKE AN EXCELLENT COMMANDER IN CHIEF.
2007-08-13 06:09:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
What did Bill do?
Thats right....nothing.
Bill was a status quo chimpanze. What did Bill do? I think the question is...What did Bill not do?
2007-08-13 03:45:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
We will have to wait and see
2007-08-13 02:40:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by jean 7
·
0⤊
0⤋