All other love making activities having been done but no penetration, was there ever intercourse done by definition?
2007-08-12 17:06:03 · 9 answers · asked by Don S 5 in Social Science ➔ Gender Studies
Legally and biologically, no. You may get ideologically driven answers on this question here, but that does not make them valid. Some, you will find, not even coherent.
2007-08-12 17:13:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
No it's not intercourse it didn't penetrate the vagina but anal and mouth sex is like intercourse is almost the same way then it occurred
2007-08-16 21:17:06 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps technically intercourse did not occur but I personally would still consider oral, anal, hand-jobs, milk run etc. a form of sex.
Edit: a milk run is when the dude rubs himself off on the woman's cleavage.
2007-08-13 00:23:46 · answer #3 · answered by Somes J 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The penis must "pentrate" the vagina for intercourse to occur.
2007-08-16 19:31:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If there weren't any insertion of penis into vagina, then no, intercourse did not occur.
2007-08-13 00:15:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, technically it was not intercourse.
2007-08-13 22:25:02 · answer #6 · answered by yourmtgbanker 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only social.
2007-08-13 00:20:14 · answer #7 · answered by sashali 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What's a milk run?
2007-08-13 01:08:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Try a dictionary.
2007-08-13 00:36:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋