English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Try to convince me here guys. Automatic 10 points for the best argument! Good Luck!

2007-08-12 15:21:15 · 6 answers · asked by Darth Revan 7 in Sports Basketball

I just needed to do this because I am getting bored with the questions being posted here in the basketball category the trade this, trade that. Sheesh!

2007-08-12 15:23:15 · update #1

6 answers

No. Jordan IS Jordan on which greatness is compared. Kobe is at his prime now but could not lead his team past the first round. Jordan at his prime leads the Bulls to championships. Okay some may argue that Kobe had better skills. Yes admittedly, But my question is this: Where was those stats when the Lakers needed it more? Jordan elevated his game always come Play-off time. And come on the other answerers always point out that Jordan can't lead his team to the play-offs. Come to think of it it was just four years into his career. Kobe on his first year alone had Shaq and that explains the success. So there.

2007-08-12 16:59:28 · answer #1 · answered by Red Auerbach: The Thinker 4 · 0 0

If I have Michael Jordan I'm not trading him. But if Kobe Bryant was on the Bulls in place of Mike during the same years it wouldn't be bad. Kobe plays great defense. Kobe and Scottie Pippen as a combo would be incredibly hard to beat.

2007-08-12 16:08:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

well you gotta keep MJ all you gotta do is look at MJ's flu game to tell what kind of player MJ is he is the greatest of all time you would never trade a all time great for someone who cant win without the most dominating big man of all time besides you can see MJ domination on both sides of the court you can only see kobe try on offense he has no defense and smart coaches like Mike D'Antoni can open that up bcuz anyone can score on kobe especially in the open court MJ made his team one of the greatest of all time but kobe didnt do that it was all shaq kobe was the sidekick for his championships

2007-08-12 15:43:38 · answer #3 · answered by Q-tip 2 · 2 0

no i would keep Jordan because he had leadership skills that
no one else had he was extremely clutch and he told everyone what they had to do so they could win the game.
Kobe might have better skills than jordan but he can't lead a team and he hogs the ball
Jordan passed the ball out and trusted his teammates
Jordan had great skills too just not as good as kobe.
he could do everything

2007-08-12 15:25:33 · answer #4 · answered by Shamgod 3 · 1 0

No way. Jordan would beat Bryant half to death by slapping him repeatedly with his own ego
Anyone who would trade Jordan for Bryant straight up ought to have their head examined.

2007-08-12 15:44:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Who is Kobe? nothing but a show off

2007-08-12 15:32:45 · answer #6 · answered by MUHAMMAD S 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers