Our President George W. Bush.
2007-08-12 14:23:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
6⤋
I guess there should be a qualifier:
Based on how much each knows about everything involved in this war, who has been the most honest.
Bush can't be totally forthcoming because, fairly, he can't due to security concerns. but he is a politician, so he is lying about something!
Hillary doesn't know everything Bush knows, but she is also a politician, so she will lie when it will benefit her.
Sheehan knows very little, by comparison but she did lose a son and what she knows, she tells. She has an agenda, but no reason to lie.
Therefore, Sheehan is the answer.
2007-08-12 14:36:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by MIKE F. 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's an easy one - Cindy thinks the terrorists are freedom fighters, Hillary did the Kerry twist from the beginning and President Bush told everyone that this would be a long and difficult struggle.
Bush, hands down.
2007-08-12 14:33:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
None of the above, no one has been honest about it because they all have goals in the large question mark that is Iraq. Cindy's goal is to pull all U.S. troops, as vindication of Bush killing her son. Hillary's (and her cronies) goal U.S. troops pulled cause that's what the overall population of the U.S. wants (and it's always easy to do the popular thing). George's (and his cronies) goal is to make a lump sum of cash off of this misadventure instead of really trying to fight the war , they "kinda" fight the war (if we wanted to win this war , we would, it would be cold , brutal, bloody with lots of "civilian deaths" but it would be done if our leaders decided to win) , since the war chokes off oil being delivered , that makes oil prices higher Bush makes money. Cheney's former business (which he probably has stock in) get huge contracts for rebuilding Iraq. And both parties have a lot to lose on flip flopping on their positions on the ordeal. Hence Republicans stick to supporting the President , even though he's done just about everything to only "kinda" fight the war. Because that's their party base. And the Democrats stick to whining about "civilian deaths" , and wanting to pull out of Iraq. And neither side is right. Yes, there are large numbers of Jihadies wanting to kill every American they can aim their suicide bombers towards. But we can't support the Iraqi's if they are not going to support us. Iraqi's simply don't care about Iraq, they only care about being a sunni, kurd, shiite, or Al-Qaeda-ite. And killing anyone who is'nt apart of their sect. We can't support that, that's called ethnic cleansing. I'm against the Iraq war, but I'm for the war against terrorism. And the two are not the same thing.
2007-08-12 14:41:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cindy Sheehan and Hillary Clinton, bless their tiny black hearts, honestly believe that President Bush is the devil. So anything out of their pie-holes is going to be anti-Bush and to hell with it if it's true or not.
President Bush is not Clinton. He isn't knowingly lying to the American public. If he says anything that turns out later to be wrong it's because he was given bad information to begin with. Not because he sat there, stared in the camera and purposely lied through his teeth.
2007-08-12 14:31:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
President Bush. He never knowingly lied to us. Clinton and Sheehan have never met a lie that would not tell. While, I feel for Ms. Sheehan and the loss she has had, letting anger drive you never leads to anything good.
2007-08-12 14:52:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jeff E 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
THe President, of course; Cindy's view is from the view of a distruahgt mother of a fallen soldier that cannot cope with her loss and blames everyone else for her misfortune; in the case of Hillary, she sees the war through the prism of a politician who is like a weather vane, pointing to where the political winds blow.
THe President sees it through the prism of a comande rin chief, who has a lot of people to listen for advice; from General on the ground and in the Pentagon, to diplomats working behind closed doors to the intelligence apparatus that keeps its eyes and ears open to the distant beats of discourse.
Whethever you like him or not, he's the Commander-in-Chief and the person whose steadfast leadership despite the discourse, hatred and rhetoric, has kept his eye keenly on the task of protecting this country and to spread liberty.
If you do not like my response? Too bad; is my final answer.
2007-08-12 17:46:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
"I got an email the other day and it said, 'Cindy if you didn't use so much profanity ... there's people on the fence that get offended.'
"And you know what I said? 'You know what? You know what, god damn it? How in the world is anybody still sitting on that fence?'
"'If you fall on the side that is pro-George and pro-war, you get your *** over to Iraq, and take the place of somebody who wants to come home. And if you fall on the side that is against this war and against George Bush, stand up and speak out.'" --Cindy, BuzzFlash, August 20, 2005.
2007-08-12 14:35:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by vladoviking 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Cindy Sheehan is a nut, Hillary is a loon, so I'll go with the Prez...
2007-08-12 14:28:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by makrothumeo2 4
·
6⤊
1⤋
Our president George W. Bush. Let me say HONEST, not necessarily right. George bush's heart is in the right place and he believes what he is doing is the right thing. But we shouldve gotten outt f their a long time ago and it should have been managed a lot better.
2007-08-12 14:30:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Sheehan without a doubt.
Bush has NEVER told the truth about ANYTHING having to do with Iraq and Clinton can't decide whether she is for the war or against it.
2007-08-12 14:27:02
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋