2007-08-12 12:20:47 · 16 answers · asked by Dangerous 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No of course not!!! both wars were and are a failure. during Reagans term cocaine and other hard drugs were sold and bought just as easily as they are today. plus dont forget that ecstacy was not illega during the early 80´s. there were a number ecstacy factories in L.A and Texas operating legally and paying taxes. As for the war on terrorism we all can see that it got worse and U.S support and credibility is at its worst in the history of the country.
2007-08-12 12:31:56 · answer #1 · answered by qtpie 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
It's much more effective! It hasn't made us any safer from terrorism, but it's allowed Bush to act like a dictator, declaring himself immune to laws he himself has signed, allowing him to fight a war based on lies against a people that never threatened us, to wiretap without warrants, throw people in prison with no charges or evidence, etc. etc. Those are all things Reagan could never get away with.
2007-08-12 12:26:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
No, because Regan's War on Drugs actually had a point to it and achieved results.
2007-08-12 12:27:03 · answer #3 · answered by Young Einstein 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
the two suck, inspite of the undeniable fact that i could provide GW the nod as worse , Iraq is yet another vietnam, he mandatory to do extra homework. there became a reason the Saudis dod no longer enable his dad help the coup do overthrow Saddam, regrettably he did no longer think of issues by way of, no longer to point fire anybody for their incompetence in our intlligence dept.
2016-11-12 03:43:44 · answer #4 · answered by sanderson 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. I'm not using the drugs or engaging in the terrorism. How about you?
2007-08-12 12:26:25 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Congratulations on your membership in the piss-and-moan club.
Drugs and terrorism are problems. What would you advocate to stop them?
2007-08-12 12:33:21 · answer #6 · answered by Pythagoras 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
How about the dems "War On Poverty". That's always a side splitter.
2007-08-12 12:31:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yes, both are designed to divert America's attention away from the widening divide between the rich and poor.
2007-08-12 12:26:47 · answer #8 · answered by Mitchell . 5 · 6⤊ 2⤋
or Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty
2007-08-12 12:29:49 · answer #9 · answered by nileslad 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think honestly it is more effective. There is just so many drugs in the USA it's disgusting. I think we are the world #1 consumer of cocaine, isn't that a healthy way to live your life. Family values are encouraged when people use cocaine and also, crime decreases when people use cocaine, haha : (
2007-08-12 12:26:44 · answer #10 · answered by eldude 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋