English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I don't think so. I support srong censorship in this regard.

2007-08-12 11:43:12 · 34 answers · asked by AjitPD 3 in Society & Culture Cultures & Groups Other - Cultures & Groups

34 answers

We shouldn't have to hide things from children. Most people think they will become emotionally unstable for some reason. I strongly appose children watching violent movies, or playing violent games. Its odd that our society views sex and nudism as dirty and taboo. But murder and violence can be found on TV.

2007-08-12 11:50:04 · answer #1 · answered by reelperspectiv 5 · 2 0

As far as movies go whether or not children should watch would depend on the rating and then the discretion of the parents. I think that it depends on the child's age and the parent's beliefs. No one is perfect but I personally try to keep a close watch on what my children watch. There are web sites that can let you know about the sexual content, etc in different movies. I don't think that children of certain age groups should watch french kissing in TV or movies

2007-08-19 10:18:22 · answer #2 · answered by Maria S 1 · 0 1

No. This is not good for children to watch French kisses on the TV. You raised your voice for strong cencor but I am against any cencor. People should get the opportuinity to what they wnat to express. It may be that due to the kiss, the scene is loosing a lot. It is better to rate a particular movie A when it is improper for children.

2007-08-12 13:59:19 · answer #3 · answered by Ramprasad 3 · 1 1

All forms of censorship attract the attention of the people being "protected". Censorship simply does not work. The outcome is to create an open forum in which disinformation is often given more weight than information.

TRUTH IS BEST.

My personal experience working with teens, has been that they know everything in some form. The best thing we can do is give them an abundance of real information, scientific information, medical information, personal information. Information based in physiology and reality. When we try to give them nonsense, they know we are giving them jive.

We DISCREDIT OURSELVES and our message by our false facade. Any nonsense is immediately detected. Any falsehood invites investigation to learn the truth.
If you want children to be over focused and over curious and experimenting, try hiding something from them. They will soon know more than you.

I do know from many years of linguistics study and practice that what we resist persists. What we resist we create, exaggerate or become. Censorship is resistance.

A different question for you is why would you want them to be uneducated? And who do you prefer they get information from relative to these personal and developmental subjects? They can get it from you or from someone else. Where do you have the best chance of giving the information the slant you want?

2007-08-19 10:43:51 · answer #4 · answered by bondioli22 4 · 0 0

I think that for parents it's easier to teach children that killing people is wrong and that they are not to do it but when it comes to sex it's a little harder because sex isn't wrong but you don't want your kids having sex at a young age either. So I think that it a matter of what is easier to explain what is wrong. But I have to say pornography isn't meant for little kids and depending on how old my kids are I wouldn't let them watch violence either, so age can have a factor too. Also like others have said, sex doesn't always equal love. This reminds me of a Foamy rant that I saw on YouTube. You can look it up or if you ask I can add a link to it.

2016-03-16 22:08:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If you walked into a restaurant and were fed the same meal of cr*p that we see daily on TV, you'd never go back to that restaurant. Unfortunately, TV doesn't work that way and my wife and I are more or less restricted to The Animal Planet.

2007-08-19 14:52:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think the way television is headed nowadays that there is nothing wrong with it. As long as we teach our children then they should grow up well. Lets face it kids now know more than we did at their age so why try and hide common things/ issues from them. There is a time and place for certain issues and maybe tv helps bring up the topics of them. Then we can talk and explain to our children.

2007-08-12 21:42:06 · answer #7 · answered by jayman31 4 · 0 2

No. TV, movies, video games, and music videos are ruining our children. Parents can't spend enough time with them. By age twelve they are dressing and talking like twenty-five year olds. They are drinking, smoking, and doing drugs. Shop lifting and skipping school are sports. It's not uncommon for thirteen and fourteen years to become pregnant. The questions I see here in various categories could curl your hair. Younger and younger kids want tattoos, piercings, and make-up advice. So many are worried that they are pregnant. These children are completely missing childhood. Isn't it a shame?

2007-08-18 19:00:25 · answer #8 · answered by curious connie 7 · 0 3

Why not? I think it is okay. A French kiss is less than an Indian kiss always.

2007-08-12 16:54:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

yes ,i think it is ok. Because sooner or later children are going to learn it from some where. I will remind you that this is the 21st century that we all live in, not the 18th century. So wake up and smell the roses and drink the coffee.

2007-08-19 20:00:25 · answer #10 · answered by eddie 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers