No, they are not but want to give mixed signals to help their popularity with both pro- and anti- monarchists.
2007-08-14 03:08:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Namlevram 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
We should pay for this as Buckingham Palace is in fact a State owned property with a lease to the royal family. Therefore Buckingham Palace is as good as a council building and should therefore be repaired out of the tax payers pocket.
2007-08-14 12:16:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I do respect the royal family.
It would be nice to repair the Buckingham Palace and to make sure it looks nice and to keep it up.
Of course, I think they will never tear it down.
I don't know if the royal family will last forever or not but even if they don't, I think they will still need to have the palace up as a historical monument.
2007-08-15 09:45:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sarah* 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
So much for Gordon Brown's speech on patriotism
has he forgotten already ?
Buckingham Palace is part of British History and should be preserved for the tourism that it brings to Britian .
2007-08-12 09:10:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jezabel 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
for goodness sake, why do most people say : they should pay for it themselves they have enough money, why should myyyy taxes pay for it? because it belongs to you, you own Buck' House not the Royal Family, now I could understand it if you were asked to pay for work done at Balmoral House, because that is Her Majesty's private residence. most people are unaware that these places are NATIONAL treasures and not private, to pay £3m on making Buck' House safe and pristine again, is not alot to make sure that this fantastic monument is kept for further generations to enjoy.
the Queen has an allowance of about, and don't quote me on this, $14m a year, with this money she has to pay for everything associated with the Royal house, that includes insurance, gas, electric, wages and so on and so on. the Monarchy and the Royal Residences bring in millions in tourism a year, the Americans alone travel this great country of ours in awe of the many Royal wonders we have to offer, so they bring in more than they cost
can the same be said for the Government, 2 words, John Prescott!!!!!!!!!!
Brown should do what is good for the economy, and pay up!!
2007-08-15 09:30:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If Buck House is such a tourist attraction as some people think, why not turn it into a hotel? The yanks and Japanese would pay a fortune to stay there and that would pay for the roof. The queen has plenty of other homes to go to.
2007-08-15 09:28:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yeah Labour is abandoning our Royal family,cause they want a Rep and believe you me it is them that will be sorry cause that's why tourist flock to the UK.And I dont see why the Queen must pay as it is National Tresure so yes I think the goverment is responsible.
2007-08-12 09:03:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Wonderstar 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Gordon brown hanged for treason!!
Now there's a headline for you!
The royal family is a good business that nets the UK a tidy profit
2007-08-15 01:14:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think that the Queen should get a lawyer, they are renting the Palace and don't own it. Mr Brown is being a slum lord!
2007-08-12 14:10:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
once you mentioned empty headed layabouts you neglected out the 'drunken' As a Royalist i'm offended that those 2 louts are going to hold down the Monarchy. they might desire to the two pull themselves jointly or be removed from the line of succession.
2016-10-15 02:20:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You must think in the poor people, royal family had duties with all people of the country, one of the duty is paid taxes, they are rich why not.
2007-08-15 10:57:45
·
answer #11
·
answered by mary g 2
·
0⤊
0⤋