English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1.They lied about the weapons of mass destruction and all we found were weapons of mass deception
2.Thousands of innocent(not ye proven guilty) prisoners of war await a trial date in concentration camps
(Abhu Garib, And Gitmo)
3.Smart Americans now know that our govermant was hijacked by a ruthless thug orginization called Halliburton, and it's allies Exxon, BP, Shell, 76. Citgo and others, and Bush and chenny both have trust accounts in hallinurton

2007-08-12 07:44:14 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

17 answers

They should be but I don't think this congress has the heart for such an undertaking. The new administration and congress will have plenty to do cleaning up the mess left behind. I hope they start with restoring the constitution and make it impossible to bypass again.

2007-08-12 07:54:17 · answer #1 · answered by Follow the money 7 · 1 1

You have quite obviously been thoroughly brainwashed by the liberal media! Fact: There were weapons of mass destruction; they had at least a year to get them out of the country to Libya and other places and our troops STILL found some!
In regards to your #2, this IS a war and that's how war criminals are and should be treated! What would you suggest? Some white collar prison like the Enron execs went to?
Your #3 doesn't even deserve a response. If everyone in this country had the cowardly John Kerry mentality that you've adopted...you'd likely be ruled and governed by Taliban and Al Queda already! Apparently, you don't care and are only concerned about the overall well being of the war criminals that we have in custody. Your Howard Dean kool-aid is really getting stale! Can you make the same kind of shrill scream like he does?!!

2007-08-12 08:07:47 · answer #2 · answered by AgsFan 5 · 0 0

And who, of the people who actually have the authority to do so, are "demanding that Cheney be tried for war crimes"? Can you name one member of the ICJ that has called for an indictment of the former vice-president? Do you even know what the ICJ is? Heck, I think OJ did murder his ex-wife and her boyfriend, but that does not mean that there should be another trial just because of what I think. The same goes for you, > Anybody who does actual research will tell you that websites are not true documentation. I asked you to name one (just one) member of the ICJ that is even considering issuing an indictment to Dick Cheney and you post a website that is not from the ICJ. Guess what, the three morons from "Loose Change" have a website. Is that evidence? Of course not. There is more evidence that Bigfoot exists. How about you have some refresher on how to do actual research and check out the ICJ. Then come back with what you have. >BTW. I did bother to do some research for on this matter. The ICJ deals with international agreements, not war crimes. However, the International Criminal Court does prosecute war crimes and crimes against humanity; they have issued warrants to the president of Sudan recently. The ICC has received hundreds of complaints concerning the 2003 invasion of Iraq, but has not found any basis for issuing any warrants, much less indictments.

2016-05-20 22:42:36 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

If they lied (even though they were operating on intelligence that even Democrats said was good intelligence) they were not under oath, so that charge wouldn't stick.

As for war crimes, if they are tried for war crimes then the Congress and Senate (including all the Democrats) also need to be brought up on those charges since they voted for the war, and have continually voted to fund it.

Oh, and thanks for reminding us about how Haliburton is an evil "ruthless thug orginization" when a Republican is in office, but the greatest thing since sliced bread when it's a Democrat giving the no bid contracts to them.

Oh, and for the liberals that like to be the spelling police, I know that "orginization" is spelled wrong, I was spelling it in my post the same way the questioner spelled it, that's why it's in quotes.

2007-08-12 08:09:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Either you are privvy to knowledge no one else is, or this is just another delusional outburst from an undereducated, whiny liberal. Here's a tip, stop cutting school, learning can be a wonderful thing. Grow up and start looking for a life before you get on a public forum and humiliate yourself, troll. Hurry back to your bridge!

2007-08-12 08:43:45 · answer #5 · answered by Scott B 7 · 0 0

1. Jury still out we haven't looked in Syria where there at.

2. To hell with those murderers, I suppose you love innocent people being killed by them.

3. You are way of base with #3, dummy its the Secret Society of the Masons that have had this country for decades, although I will concede Bush is a member.

2007-08-12 07:53:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

They should but they will not.

But not for any of the reasons you list.

Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld committed war crimes by violated 18 USC 2441 -- the federal war crimes statute -- as confirmed by the US Supreme Court twice (2004, 2006).

As for lying under oath -- they have not done that so far that anyone has proven. Lying in political speeches is not perjury.

2007-08-12 07:47:20 · answer #7 · answered by coragryph 7 · 3 3

No, because an Internation War criminal is currently advising Bush = H. Jew Kissinger

2007-08-12 08:13:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

did they lie about weapon?i thought clinton gave a big speech about how she checked with her sources and it was a fact that they had them?remember when the congress voted?remember who was respnsable for our intelligence for 8 years before bush?i think maybe bill clinton was over our intell.that was miss informed.DONT YOU?

2007-08-12 07:55:33 · answer #9 · answered by verysmartguy 1 · 2 0

No they wont...they took care of that before they accused the Israeli government of it when Israel attached Lebanon...

They had this drawn up within the international courts of the world...I would call them cowards....and back stabbers

2007-08-12 07:54:46 · answer #10 · answered by kadnil 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers