I don't think there is anything wrong with homosexuality. They aren't hurting anybody (unlike pedophiles or murderers) So i dont see what the big issue is.
I think they should be able to marry, because God would want them to be happy. he made them the way he wanted to and in his eyes they are beautiful.
And they are just as capable of being good parents as any of us. In fact, I've seen some straight people who have NO business being parents but they get to breed like rabbits. So why not let a mature open-minded gay couple give a child a good home they might not ever have had?
2007-08-12 07:48:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by HappyBunny 3
·
4⤊
2⤋
Homosexuality is a perversion of natural order. You would need to be very stupid to think that sex is intended for homosexuality. Sex is intended for procreation in an act of love. The ability of humankind to choose to create life is ennobling the status of humankind. To pervert the intent of sex is debasing and degrading to man.
Homosexuality is a reducing of man to the same level as an animal. This debasing of man has the effect of loss of respect for life and each other. All rights and liberties come from a belief that man is special and has God given rights. When you act against the intent of God, you deny that authority and you no longer have any basis for those rights.
If you behave as an animal do not expect to have the right of man.
Homosexuality is a choice, just as all things are a choice. When homosexual behavior is practiced you become addicted. This addiction is in the form of genetic change and is most difficult to over come. Studies of twins have found that your genetic makeup changes with life experience. This is why you see the physical changes in homosexuals.
Homosexuality is a disorder and a perversion. No one with a disorder or perversion of any kind should be allowed to adopt.
2007-08-12 09:12:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Tlocity 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think they should take a test and be financially able to take care of the kids.. and no gay bashing here.. I think the exact same thing for straight hetro or metro sexual parents. Not only can homosexuals be better in some cases as paraental units, but it can take kids out of "puppy mill" style foster homes.
Homosexuality is both learned from environment and some genetics. Nature vs nuture. I lead more to nuture.
Married no. Marriage is defined currently in most areas as the legal union between 1 man and 1 woman. Should they have another option that gives them the same rights? Absolulety. For those against it. It can take some people off state aid and put them with partners that have insurance.
Sin? sure, everything is a sin in one way or another. Mortal sin? nah. is it just wrong? it can be, the same way hetro can be wrong. i.e. 35 year old pedafiles.
2007-08-12 08:05:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by TheHangedFrog 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Homosexuality is something you are born with.
As for marriage, any church is allowed to decide which marriages to bless. However, if there are rights to marriage, there must also be the same responsibilities as there are with heterosexual couples. In other words, I have no objection to people entering into a contract to provide for one another as part of one household and no objection to that contract being properly recognized by the state.
Children is where I must part company with the gay rights lobby. The best chance for any child is to have positive male and female role models in the home. A homosexual relationship precludes that and there is no guarantee that the extended family will have strong enough bonds. I know that is also true of heterosexual couples, but two wrongs don't make a right.
2007-08-12 08:01:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by skip 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
I think they should be able to adopt. There are so many kids that need a good home. If someone is perfectly able to take care of a child and provide it with everything he/she needs then I don't see a problem. I also think they should get married. They are people just like heterosexual so they should have the same rights as heterosexuals. I also think people are born gay. I know many gay people who had a hard time coming out. For example their Family disowns them. I am not gay and I would not want to be gay, just because they are so mistreated. Plus I think it would be hard to have that lifestyle so I don't know why anyone would choose that.
2007-08-12 07:54:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
"Just wrong" IS being a sin -- it's a religious or moral judgment that you don't like what they are doing.
And no, I don't think being gay is wrong, nor is it a sin in my religion -- nor in many other religions.
I don't believe laws should discriminate against people based on gender -- and all the current laws against same-sex marriage have nothing to do with sexual orientation -- they are purely gender-based discrimination.
As for adoption -- the sole concern should be whether the step-parent can take good care of the child -- and plenty of heterosexual people make far worse choices in who they sleep with that are far more directly harmful to the child
As for the choice vs. genetics argument -- about 1% of mammal and bird species show homosexual tendencies. Which means it's not juts a human thing. And if it happens all the time in nature, it's hard to argue that it's not natural.
2007-08-12 07:46:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
Sure they should be allowed to get married, I think your born that way and it is not a sin. I do apose them adopt children though, I have nothing against any one who is homosexual but I think that is might cause confusing in the children. I know they probably would have loving and warm homes but at this point in time, I don't agree with it.
2007-08-12 07:52:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
NO they should not be allowed to adopt who know what those perverts will do to those kids behind closed doors. They should be sent back to mexico where they belong. Have you ever been to the mexican border towns its like a freak show! They are not born that way they choose to be that way because they will do anything to get money.
2007-08-12 08:12:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
This is a free country, I don't think anyone has the right to tell you who you are or aren't allowed to want to grow old with. I don't think your born gay or that it's a disease, just as young girls grow to think boys are attractive and visa versa, I think they just grow into it (if that makes any sense at all), like you make the choice, not really make the choice like you wake up one day and say "Hey I think I'll be gay today", but that's just who your attracted too.
2007-08-12 07:49:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Juicy Fruit 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
I don't have a problem with homosexuality, and I don't see why they shouldn't be allowed to adopt kids. Their sexual preference shouldn't have an impact on their parenting abilities.
2007-08-12 07:48:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by .. 5
·
2⤊
1⤋