against feminism and equality. They even went as far with comparing people who criticize female sex supremacists to people who opposed the blacks rights movement. Do you think this comparison is accurate ? Why ? Why not ?
If we stick to the comparison who are the female sex supremacists, the ones who want equal laws and rights or the ones who oppose equal laws and rights and want special laws and rights ?
2007-08-12
06:05:25
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Social Science
➔ Gender Studies
mollypop I never said men should have special rights. You can think (and prove) you are better than a person x, its called fair competition.
Incidently female sex supremacists try to justify special rights and perks, with an inferiority of women, by saying they need special help and attention, although you also have those who just say women are special and therefore deserve X.
2007-08-12
12:27:43 ·
update #1
The women who want to oppress men instead of just having equality between the sexes are a large and vocal group...and I will speak out against them because I am for HUMAN RIGHTS and that means everyone's rights, not just the female sex's rights...but everyone, irregardless of color, race, creed, national origin, socioeconomic group, religion, and GENDER...and I am a woman...and I like men and want them to be powerful people...as I want women to be that way too...but power is not bullying...
2007-08-12 06:42:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Humans, by nature, all want to be top-dog. It doesn't matter if they are old, young, educated, not-so-well-educated, red, yellow, black, white or brown, male or female, each group wants to be superior to the opposing group/groups.
Comparing to the blacks rights group is accurate, to a point. That point is when either the "female sex supremacists" try to be "better than men". This is the problem, when a group thinks they are special and deserve better treatment, or whatever, than other groups.
Sorta like sports players, movie stars, politicians, doctors and lawyers...
2007-08-12 13:15:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Nothingusefullearnedinschool 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
To criticize female supremacists is the same as to criticize white supremacists. No one group is innately superior to another: not whites, not blacks, not women, not men. Criticizing the female supremacists is not the same as criticizing the black rights movement, because all the blacks want is equality, while the females want superiority. It is not at all the same.
2007-08-12 13:11:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by illuminatiscott 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
I am not sure what planet everyone is from but women to me seem to get everything they want. Where is this inequality? If anything most men extend more courtesy to women then women do to men. How many women have held the door for me? Zero. I do it for everyone.
Women supremacists are out for one thing...attention and power and the destruction of familly values
2007-08-12 14:11:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by K.O. 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
What about people who post that women are inferior to men and then go about inventing the term "female sex supremacist"? Are they idiots, or just hypocrites? Maybe both?
2007-08-12 14:44:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
The only law that´s needed is one that says that all people are equal under the law and have equal rights and responsibilities. Then it becomes up to the individual to strive if they want to get ahead.Incidentally the US Constitution only uses the pronoun "he" as far as I can see.
2007-08-12 13:28:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Think female as your mother and sister--Don`t think them as a child producing machine.Both are equally responsible for our development.As swami vivekananda said--Male and female are the two wings of a bird--A bird can not fly with one wing--so our society can not develop without the advancement of female--So no question of supremacy arises, all are equal-- Females must have the equal rights and opportunities to flourish for modern civilisation.
2007-08-12 13:28:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sisir 4
·
1⤊
3⤋