English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-08-12 06:03:08 · 45 answers · asked by xxxxx 2 in Politics & Government Politics

45 answers

Not me, and no one else that I know.

2007-08-12 06:09:14 · answer #1 · answered by midnight&moonlight'smom 4 · 3 2

Anyone who claims there is no evidence to support this claim is just lying to themselves.
1. They claim that it was the pancake effect on the buildings. However, the buildings fell at free fall speed. If the floors were falling and hitting the floors below, shouldn't they have met resistance. Free fall speed is a fall which encounters the least amount of resistance.
2. Nothing hit Building 7. If you watch the video of Building 7 falling, the center collapses first. In a controlled demolition, they blow the center first to ensure that the building collapses on itself with as little damage to the buildings around it as possible.
3. Of all the tapes that were confiscated from hotels and other businesses around the pentagon, that would have shown a clear video of the plane hitting it, why are they refusing to show us.
4. In PA, why was there no wreckage from the plane. The pieces that were there could be carried out by hand. Haven't you ever seen what it looks like when a commercial plane crashes, there is wreckage everywhere. But this time it was damn near non-existent.
5. I could keep going, but some of these people wouldn't believe it if they had all the evidence, because they don't think our own government would do such a thing. I have news for you, take a look at Operation Northwoods!

2007-08-12 06:27:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anthony M 4 · 2 1

Yes I am sure what you say is correct., The twin towers never actually existed but it was just a Hollywood picture that made them appear to exist . Likewise their destruction was all done at Universal studios controlled from Pyongyang and anyway George Bush does not really exist either . He is just a another computerised projection controlled from space by the Daleks who gave the orders to "exterminate-exterminate all humans". and of course the Daleks are likewise responsible for global warming and the tsunami and Hitler and World War II were inside jobs too. Very clever you have worked it all out and think you deserve a star which coming up with love.

2007-08-16 05:35:45 · answer #3 · answered by Wamibo 5 · 0 0

I don't beleive that it could have been an inside job. This just seems like a nutty conspiracy theory. I've met many Muslims who say it MUST have been an inside job as "no Muslim could possibly do this." Sounds like that river in Egypt to me. De Nile.

America has been guilty of some awful things but I don't think they would do something as terrible as that. They didn't need to murder 2,000 of their own people as an "excuse" to go to war with the middle east. A well placed assassination or something (Dubya for example, lol) would have sufficed.

2007-08-13 21:20:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

911 has to be an inside job.The electronic equipment (telephone switchboard;2-way radios;recorders etc.,) is too sensitive to allow the vagaries of wind and weather to interfere with a prompt response by the emergency services when needed, and the extraneous noise of an outdoor environment makes the risk of the 911 operator misunderstanding far too great for comfort.

2007-08-12 06:16:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I believe it could be a inside job. Dont trust the politicians these days, some of them are worser then the terrorists.

2007-08-13 06:43:48 · answer #6 · answered by Mr Abba 5 · 0 0

There is enough evidence to question it. I'm not saying that it was. But there is alot of evidence that has been covered up and I think deserves looking at. Why would it hurt to investigate this evidence? At least some questions would be answered and it would only benefit the 9/11 victims and the American people to know exactly what went on.

2007-08-12 06:12:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

It was with J F K and his brother Bobby and it was also an inside job or set up with Diane Battenburg in France.

But there again the American and British governments are past masters at fooling all of the people all of the time.

Do they fool all you people who visit this site?

2007-08-12 11:34:31 · answer #8 · answered by Equaliser. 3 · 0 1

I doubt it's an inside job. How could you possibly destroy those towers and cause the death of all those poor people. Come on ! What's weird though is that the Osama guy is still at large ... and the weapons of mass destructions never showed up either. hmmm... strange times we're living indeed

2007-08-12 06:09:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

I have seen some very compelling evidence to support this theory. I am not sure as to the extent of the conspiracy but I know that there are elements in our government (such as the CFR) who will do anything to further their goal of a one world government under the United Nations.

2007-08-12 06:12:04 · answer #10 · answered by Ethan M 5 · 3 1

inside job?? Lets sit back and think for a few minutes.....we knew it was coming sooner or later. weather it be the towers or something else....it was well planned. It was just a matter of time that something that big would happen. The warning signs were up - our security was slack, and they hit us when we least expected . So as for you asking if it was an inside job ?? I would have to say 'yes' - its all our fault..

2007-08-12 06:10:19 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers