Why does it take a lawsuit to get Hillary to produce all non-exempt records?

Question

http://www.judicialwatch.org/6353.shtml

You'd think she has something to hide.

Answer 1

Long before all the complaints about the Bush White House we had Travelgate, the Rose Law Firm records loss, Monicagate, etc and the leader and first lady the dems still rave about always were coming up with ways of hiding records and staff statements. Heck they even have Sandy Berger go in and steal records after 9-11 to stop an inquiry into what the Clinton White House knew about 9-11 planning. And we haven't even mentioned their blocking of all the research and committee work on the Health Care proposal.

Answer 2

i would imagine that she does have something to hide but then again so does every president and family that has been in office.

what i find most interesting is that when the clinton's were in office, there was press about how many times Air Force One, was taken out almost like a charter for daughter Chelsea and her schoolmate freinds. This costs a ton of money to take out / staff. The plane should only be used for official government business and that business meeting should not be planned around personal vacations. Companies have very clear travel policies, it seems that our government does not have standards

Answer 3

What does it take to get George Bush to be truthful? How does it help his credibility to order people not to testify at a Congressional hearing or to ignore supoenas?
I think Hillary Clinton has far less to hide than Bush. At what point does he take accountability for the things he has done?
What happened to 363 TONS of cash that was sent to Iraq and disappeared into the night. Why were other companies ignored and Halliburton given a no bid contract when it has direct ties into the White House?
Lots of questions need answers.....Bush definately is hiding a lot. Why does that not worry you too?

Answer 4

Same reason Kerry wouldn't reveal his military records.

Definitely hiding something incriminating.

EDIT:

OMG Kolacat - Clinton used Halliburton in Kosovo. They are the best at what they do.

Bush offerred to let people testify in the attorney firings case, but Democrats insist on them being put under oath so they can try to catch somebody misremembering something that happened years earlier so they can turn them into the next Scooter Libby.

Bush appointed all those attorneys, just like Clinton. They are political appointments, and Bush or Gonzales has the right to replace them as they see fit. Gonzales came in as the new AG, and he reviewed his 'staff' of prosecutors. Some didn't live up to his expectations - so they got the boot. Big freaking deal.

Answer 5

They already are. church homes and anybody is already exempt from the IRS. Its basically that some human beings "volunteer" to make up a company and phone it a church which, then, they arrive over into their area. The IRS (theirs) is a company itself it particularly is owned by the Federal Reserve so, who're they actually? Why have they have been given all this ability? Any jury ought to nullify something that they do against somebody. i think of their purely status is with the companies.

Answer 6

"Judicial Watch has made a number of requests"
"more than 80 million pages of documents"

How long would it take you to sort thru 80 million pages?
And that's just from one of their requests....

They send requests for hundreds of millions of pages of documents, and then complain within it takes some time to gather all that information..... because they know somebody is never going to bother thinking about what it's like to try and wade through hundreds of millions of pages....

And all of that information is already in the Library -- meaning that if you want it, you can go look at it yourself. This group just wants someone else to do the all legwork, and then complains when its not done fast enough.