Why bush does not invade Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Egypt?

Question

If he really wants to bring democracy to all those people in the middle east, how come he picked only Iraq?
we all know there are dictators in all those countries,

Answer 1

The greatest myth that drives the lie based ethos of the American people is that the US is a beacon for democracy ,liberty and freedom when in fact the historical record PROVES the very opposite but as usual Americans never let FACTS get in the way and like any mental dysfunctional ,they are totally un-aware of just what monumental hypocrites they are.

This URL shows the 12 DEMOCRACIES that the US has destroyed in the past 60 years all because their were pursuing their "National Interests" (READ PROFITS).

http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/CIAtimeline.html

The old political science adage/truism is that the "US has never met a murderous right wing dictator it couldn't fall in love with .".

Freedom,liberty,democracy and viewing the RIGHTS of others in other countries has never been ,isn't and never will be a priority for America and that is why the vast majority in the world justifiably hate the US .

Answer 2

Its called STRATEGY!!!......Iraq HAS been proven to have been sponsoring terrorist activity, had numerous UN sanctions that they were thumbing their noses at, was shooting at OUR fighter jets when they were on patrol...taking out Sadam wouldn't necessarily bother anyone in the region and everyone in the region was expecting it......so to make a statement that we should invade countries that are our allies, albeit not the greatest allies, but allies all the same, just shows that the libs have no idea of what is going on over there....and now we have a democratic contender for president saying he would go into Pakistan...which by the way would probably topple the current president of Pakistan and leave an Iran type extremist government which shows JUST how dangerous the liberal mindset is on this topic!

Answer 3

Actually if you paid attention to certain events after 9-11 you would have been informed that we nearly did invade Pakistan along with afghanistan, but were actually scared straight. Either help us or "...I'll bomb the **** out of you.."- G.W. Bush, during a conversation with the President of Pakistan during talks to use Pakistani land and air space for operations during the afghan campain shortly after the terrorist strike of 9-11. Pakistan has been quite helpful to us and we have given them the tools to help rid their country of the terrorist scum bags. The fact is the border between Afghanistan and pakistan is so mountainous and very rough terrain that there is almost no way to completely get rid of all the terrorists in one quick swoop. And to say Bush wouldnt invade a country with nuclear weapons is quite foolish, considering the fact any nuclear move pakistan would try to make would mean a full retalitory strike which would then cause massive damage and loss of life in pakistan and surrounding areas not to mention other countries would then have a reason to use their own weapons. Just because Pakistan has a nuclear bomb doesnt mean they would be dumb enough to use it. Doing so would mean the destruction of their country and they know it. Besides there are bigger things to worry about at the present moment, N.Korea and Iran. Not to mention trying to end the war in Iraq with out destroying the entire credibility and honor of the US, plus the search for Bin Laden and the recent spike of Taliban activity in Afghanistan. Israel and Palistine's near all out war, Syria's involvment of allowing terrorist crossings into Iraq among other things, China's willingness to go to war over Tiwan, need I say more? Pakistan is no threat and would be a waste of time, money, manpower and equipment urgently needed in other areas of the world. Plus we would lose a valuable staging ground for any future combat operations.

Answer 4

LOL, Kuwaitis are the richest people per capita in the world yo! They love their "dictatorship"... I was their for OIF 1 and 3. They get all the crappy labor jobs done by people from India, Pakistan, and Egypt; I used to have to guard these guys on camp Spearhead, Kuwait.
The Kuwaiti government shares oil profits; all Full blooded Male Kuwaitis over 18 get an annual stipend of over $100,000 per year dude! But they have to live most of the year in Kuwait to qualify, NOT BAD if you ask me!
~Headhunter 6

Answer 5

There was a legal basis to do it... Iraq was not compliant with UN inspectors.

While there are dictators in those countries, its not as simple as you try to make it out to be. They are supporting efforts to go after terrorists. Invasion is not the only way to change a government, as much as you are brainwashed into thinking that all Bush can do is invade.

Answer 6

I agree. Its COMMON SENSE, something that the Bush lovers lack.

Abt Pakistan, I agree. It must be invaded asap. Abt the other middle eastern states, Bush shouldnt attack them as not only would it "harm" the oil balance in the region from a US perspective but also cost him sooo much money that US will go bankrupt.

Answer 7

You left of China, Venezuela, Iran and North Korea...

Answer 8

because the other nations there will trade with him and none of them have leaders who went after his father

Answer 9

Cuz Saddam tried to kill his dad. Seriosuly, if you were president, and someone tried to kill your dad, wouldn't you go wreck shop on their nation?

Answer 10

common give the guy a break.