murali or warne who is the best bowler and why?

Answer 1

both are great by their own skills
warne is a great leggie and intelligent bowler
murali is a off spinner with a lot of variety

Answer 2

Murali

Answer 3

Muralitharan is the best bowler as compared to Warne, due to following reasons:

1) Murali has been successful in almost all countries he has
played, whereas Warne has suffered in sub-continent
pitches.

2) Murali has taken 700 wickets in less number of test
matches than Warne.

3) Murali has been successful in Test as well as ODI, whereas Warne has not been much successful in ODI as
compared to Murali.

4) Murali has got better economy rate than Warne.

Answer 4

Both are great bowlers and if you take away Murali's othrodox
bowling. Both have achieved great success and each one
has their weapon. Warne has bowled magnificently and he
has bowled those rippers and turners making the good batman
looking on.....Same with Murali.
Since both are great, Warne retired, Murali has no intentions
of retiring, he wants to do more and making him a natural
choice to be the best.

Answer 5

Shane Warne for sure. He has bowled all throughout his career without any question of his action. Murali's doosra is a very suspect delivery and without a doubt quite a few of those are throws but umpires will not call him because they are afraid they will get dropped.

Any umpire that has publicly had doubts about his action are vilified by the powerful Asian cliche.

For quality and a taint free action all through a long career it has to be Shane Warne.

Murali is a very fine bowler and would be a great wicket taker without the questionable deliveries. However for a large section of the cricket world there will always be the suspicion that he occasionally bowls illegal deliveries.

Answer 6

I think that this question depends on your personal definition of a good bowler. If you think that a good bowler is one who is versatile, can bowl many types of balls and is a strike bowler, then Murali is definitely the better one. However, if you think that a beeter bowler is one who has taken more wickets in his career, then Shane Warne's better as he has taken more wickets. However, Warne has retired already and murali has still got a while to go so who knows, murali may overtake warne in the number of wickets taken.

Overall, my personal opinion is that Murali is better.

Answer 7

Warne. There is no comparison. Warne bowls the ball whereas Murali is a chucker.

He should be kicked out of world cricket - instead of altering the rules to permit him to keep playing.

The umpires who no-balled him did the right thing but weren't backed up by the ICC because they have so many votes from the sub-continent teams.

Answer 8

murali is the best bowler than warne

because murali can bowl all the kinds of spin.
the team srilanka depends on him in all the situation
thats murali is the best bowler in my point of view.

Answer 9

Murali has the versatality in bowling. Australians tried to demoralise by saying is a chicker. His temperment , culture far outweigh for completeness. he may bypass Warne before calling it a day.

Answer 10

I feel these two players are my two EYES and I can not tell you which Eye is better than the other one. I have a better vision on the right eye than the left one. It is your duty to find which one eye is Murali and other one is Warne I leave this to you. Yours VRVRAO

Answer 11

MURALI :) he's got the world record, but shayne warne has got the most test wickets by 34 wickets