English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This is what happens when Democrat's are in charge . You can blame Bush all you want but the Fact is Jimmy Carter Started this war when he tried to shove western civilization down Muslims throats in Iran even encouraging them to over throw the Shaw . That's when Bin Laden Declared a Holy war against the USA and that's what caused the US Hostages to be kept until Regan steps in. (REPUBLICAN ) With in days the Hostages are freed . Regan has to clean up Carters mess and did so . Muslims backed way off . But then here comes Clinton with a whole new set of Blunders to mess things up again even teaming up with Carter to give Iran the Nuclear power that now threatens the USA today ! Clinton also leaves Bush in a recession not to mention not taking out Sadam when it would have been done easy with no lose of American lives. So Bush has to clean up the mess a democrat President left Just like Regan cleaned up Carters mess! Don't do it ! This is real History and Democrats hate it .No Spinning!

2007-08-11 23:03:30 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Sky I said no spinning .Or perhaps you aren't bright enough to read the question . But I must thank you for the example of how Liberals will attempt to spin so they don't look like the pathetic fools they really are

2007-08-12 10:43:41 · update #1

Xg6 say what??? Can you read a real history book . Using Rosie O'Donnell as a source will make you look foolish like you did here. Put down the remote

2007-08-12 10:52:20 · update #2

14 answers

Liberals are ignorant of real history and real facts. It is useless to try to educate them. They just spin things and tell outright lies to try to justify their silly claims.

2007-08-11 23:09:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 6

The Republicans decide to declare they're for secure practices and secure practices, yet once you look at what they have actual finished, you will see that that's in touch with instruct... loose nukes is between the biggest secure practices threats available, however the Republican president and congress have slashed the funds and guy-ability for looking and securing loose nukes. they have additionally adversarial extra advantageous scanning of shipment boxes with the aid of fact their company members tell them to. After 9/11, the President and the Republicans in congress adversarial the 9/11 cost, and basically agreed with the aid of fact of public call for. they have additionally chosen to ignore approximately most of the techniques from the cost. Cronies, returned and returned the Bush plans have failed in many cases with the aid of fact the folk placed in jobs are no longer qualified. particularly everyone knows of approximately 'Browny'. yet, there have been many extra, including Bremmer. those human beings ignore with reference to the advice or overrule determination made by ability of folk with significant adventure and information, in prefer of polocy and conservative philosophy. If we had had the nicely suited human beings in place after the Iraq conflict, the insurgency might in no way have occurred and hundreds of human beings and Iraqis does no longer have been killed. No oversight. issues in Iraq and different places have been made even worse with the aid of fact the contractors, Haliburton being the best occasion, charged the government for BILLIONS of greenbacks, and then the two did a bad activity or did no longer do the artwork in any respect. this is money that could have long gone to authentic secure practices measures. I actual have heard the Democrats strengthen all of those subject concerns and a brilliant form of others. This administration is at ultimate incompitent, yet they're probably plenty worse. (Edit) in basic terms before Bush taking on, the US grow to be in between the final financial sessions in recent history. Unemployment grow to be low. We had a funds surplus interior the government. Now... below Bush, salaries are at a stand nevertheless. The deficit is the utmost it has ever been in history (even whilst adjusted for inflation). The 'restoration' is in basic terms effecting those on the precise and maximum economists sense issues gets worse. The tax burden has shifted to the middle type. The gulf between the middle type and the rich is wider than ever. Yeah... issues are plenty extra advantageous!?

2016-10-10 01:26:15 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I am glad that atleast some American accepts responsibility for the things US actually did to earn the wrath of Muslims in the middle-east. Most of them pretend that they are the holy sheep and muslims incite them for no reason!

It's simple as this, if US had kept its sorry *** away from middle-east, nobody would've bothered to tickle it!

2007-08-12 10:08:25 · answer #3 · answered by Hotguy 1 · 0 0

Please tell me who was giving Iraq, Iran and bin Laden money and weapons in the 1980's.

Please tell me about the hostages that were being held for years in the 1980's. Specifically, the President at that time.

Please tell me which President could have taken Saddam out long before this, like the first time we were there.

Please tell me who was behind the first WTC attack that happened within the first month of Clinton taking office.

Please tell me who took the President to court to try to stop this war from even starting.

Please tell me the President that had the CIA form a unit specifically to find bin Laden, then tell me who was President when it was disbanded.

Please tell me which President said these 2 quotes:

"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority." 2002

"I am truly not that concerned about him." 2003

Okay, so what am I spinning here?

ADD: Have you noticed that I did not call you names nor did I cuss anyone out?

2007-08-11 23:28:13 · answer #4 · answered by midnight&moonlight'smom 4 · 3 3

What planet are you on? Just like all other right wingers that are incapable of admitting a mistake you take whatever facts you have and spin them anyway you like. Bush didn't have to go into Iraq. Just admit that your boy Bush f*cked up.

2007-08-12 00:34:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Bin Laden declared a holy war against the US when Daddy Bush sent troops to Saudi Arabia during the Gulf War. Back in the 1970's he was fighting the Soviets who had invaded Afghanistan, which made him an ally of the US. The Shah of Iran has nothing to do with Bin Laden

2007-08-11 23:15:08 · answer #6 · answered by xg6 7 · 4 5

Have you noticed that all the answerers who disagree with you have either cussed at you or called you names, but none of them have explained why you are wrong. Pretty typical, eh? Your question is full of historical facts, but not one intelligent rebuttal from the left.

2007-08-11 23:17:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

Was you born last night or are you just high it is one or the othere because you sure are not old enough to know jack **** go join the army an do something for your country

2007-08-11 23:10:52 · answer #8 · answered by bigdogrex 4 · 3 5

Amen! You are absolutely and without a doubt correct. So, when will you run for office? You got my vote! :)

2007-08-12 01:16:21 · answer #9 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 1 3

Great post, but don't get your hopes up too high.

Libs don't like facts and in fact, most often choose to ignore them and/or distort them.

You're talking to a group of people who don't want to 'get' it because getting it would mean they've served no usefulness to this country and in fact, have acted as traitors during a time of war.

2007-08-11 23:11:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 6

fedest.com, questions and answers