Hillary Clinton is a money stealing whore. We should put a gps tag on her and have her find him so she can say "sorry for trying to kill you"(even though she was one of the loudest to say "lets go to war") lock onto the gps tag and blow them both to hell! None of the candidates or Congress will find him. There to worried about being liked and where they can make more money.
2007-08-11 21:11:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by casperii69ii 2
·
2⤊
6⤋
All of the Presidential candidates want to capture bin Laden. Whether or not bin Laden is actually captured depends upon a lot of factors not just who elected President.
If the American people continue to demand his capture then the President (whoever that might be) will put the necessary resources (intelligence, military special forces) toward that effort.
If the American people seem to lose interest and/or don't communicate this desire to their elected officials in the House and Senate, then the necessary resources won't be there. When was the last time you contact your Congressman and Senators to let them know you want emphasis placed on the capture of bin Laden?
When the military mission ordered by President Carter to rescue the hostages failed, the American people blamed Carter. The military actually failed. Although the President is the Commander-in-Chief, if he (or she) is not provided the financial resources to maintain a strong military then we have an unequipped and weak military.
In the United States one person doesn't do it all. We are a democracy and as participating members of that democracy we all have to do are part. We must voice our opinions to the right people and decide how are financial resources are spent.
2007-08-11 23:06:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by ALR 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
I dont think the government wants to capture Bin Laden. We have sattelites in space that can zoom in on your backyard and read the dog tag on your dogs collar. We have bombs that can annihilate a city, let alone what they could do the the barren mountanside that Osama Bin Laden likes to hide in. We find fugitives hiding in foreign countries who are less important. We know what the chemical compounds on Mars are. I think it's better to let dude run around out there so he can aggrivate his cohorts and "stand out" so we can capture them. Osama Bin Laden has lotsa "fall guys" and they can't be left around to carry on his terroristic ideas. We gotta pop all these screws and we need dummies like Osama to stimulate the rest of the gang. If any one would've gotten Bin Laden it would've been Bush, but he's got other things to worry about to keep this country safe. Besides he's got all his people (who voted for him) turning into hypocrates. Wanna blame it on God? Go ahead. I voted for Bush, and he's doing exactly what a lot of good presidents before him did. I'm going to predict the future for all of America right now, Watch what happens to our next president that America thinks is so lovely. He's going to have to deal with catastrophy. What are you going to do then. You have two choices: Hate on him like you do on Bush. Or: Feel sorry for him. Which sounds more pathetic? This is America! Look at your neighbors they come from all over the world to live here. We are the land of the free and the home of the brave. Osama Bin Laden is just a psychotic pinhead who better stay hidden, because if he ever shows his face on American soil, some american dude is gonna punch his brains in.
2007-08-12 03:41:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Obama has said that he does not think it is necessary to get Bin Laden and The Clintons were not interested after he attacked that WTC the first time.
2007-08-17 17:34:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by TAT 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
that's a nicely-extensive-unfold reality that the Bush relatives has an fairly comfortable dating with the bin Ladens. particular, after the 9/eleven assaults surpassed off, the timber tried to declare that Osama grew to become into the black sheep of the bin encumbered relatives and that all and sundry the different individuals did not have touch with him, yet while that's the case, then why grew to become into Osama filmed at a bin encumbered relatives wedding ceremony purely shortly earlier the assaults surpassed off? not in straight forward terms that, yet why have been bin encumbered kinfolk flown out of the U. S. to secure practices on a similar time as all the different planes have been grounded. that's all very suspicious!
2016-10-15 01:25:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Capturing him would solve nothing. His followers would carry on and choose a leader in his mold. The enemy is the mass of radical terrorists who are being indoctrinated by their religious leaders to hate us and destroy us. When one is killed another steps up to the plate. Europe is finding out too late that they let too many of these people in legally. They did not start out there as rebellious but now they are an underclass, cannot fiind jobs and are living in ghettos-more fuel to the fire! And it is not just England but much of Europe who finally sees this problem.
REgardless of who the president is the CIA and special forces will continue to pursue him and keep him contained.
2007-08-18 12:34:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jane T 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Obama.
Hillary Clinton is a flip-flop who cannot decide whether or not she'd use the nuclear option... at least Obama has the balls to say what he thinks, instead of saying what you think when it's only politically convenient.
April 2006: "I would certainly take nuclear weapons off the table"
Aug 2007: "Presidents should be careful at all times in discussing the use and nonuse of nuclear weapons"
That's made me really disrespect Hillary Clinton. It seems she represents the Washington inside who say things only to get votes. We don't need that type of person when it comes to our security. If were going to discuss the most importent foreign policy questions of our day, I want someone whose honest with us, not saying things because it's politically feasible, and willing to listen to our concerns.
2007-08-11 21:47:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
None of them. Bin Laden is going to die of old age, or if he gets a terminal illness. Dream on.
2007-08-11 22:47:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by michelebaruch 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Although both Democratic and Republican Presidents had opportunities to capture or kill Osama they both failed. Surely, the Republicans had killed the most terrorist although also angering ignorant Middle East citizens who are slowly wising up to Al Queda and Taliban's agenda of domination in their own society and attempts to do the same in other countries..
If a Democratic President is in place following Bush, terrorist and extremist will be more inept to be enboldened to attack America and Americans more often around the globe.
2007-08-11 21:11:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Yes your are correct it must be Obama and least likely would be H. Clinton.
2007-08-18 06:19:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I honestly have no idea who WILL be most likely to capture him, but I know who will be LEAST likely:
John McCain, who has publicly stated he will continue a U.S. presence in Iraq. I know that all of the Democratic and most of the GOP candidates have acknowledged something needs to be changed in Iraq. McCain thinks we should stay the course, and is willing to continue on President Bush's policy plan.
2007-08-11 21:03:25
·
answer #11
·
answered by amg503 7
·
1⤊
3⤋