When the Islamofacist attacks us, should we try to understand their culture?

Question

Or should we blow their brains out?

Which would a liberal do and which would a conservative do?

Answer 1

Osama Bin Laden said we became a target of the jihad when our military was based in Saudi Arabia when GHW Bush attacked Iraq because of Saddam Hussein's aggression against Kuwait. OBL even went to the leaders of Saudi Arabia and offered to attack Iraq himself rather than have the U.S. military based on what he considered to be holy ground. He was refused and he wants revenge for the infidels contaminating his holy ground.

There will be no diplomacy with these people. They have no tolerance for the West and only want to kill us. We are less than human to them. When liberals speak of diplomacy, they are not talking about trying to appease the terrorists. They want diplomacy with the leaders of Syria and Iran who give aid to the terrorists and insurgents at this time. There could be some hope there. Jihadists need to be eradicated unquestionably.

Answer 2

As a semi liberal I would eschew blowing their brains out in favor of torture. I would make them listen to Hannity an Colmes with a liberal dose of Rush Limbaugh hour after hour after hour. After that nuclear dusting, any self respecting Islamofacist would be a born again Mormon while singing Donny and Marie songs inside their beige suburban home.

Answer 3

Did we know and understand the culture of the enemy just before world war 2, and were we not talking to then before they attached in Europe, Asia, and later on declared war on us. Compared to understanding are enemy now and to world war 2, there is none. How much more do we need to know about then? Yes yes yes I know there is good and bad in every Culture. Oh yes lets not forget they understand us. They hate and execute gay's its not a way life its a crime to them, and women's Rights its not on their agenda, marry the person of your choice, same thing. Democracy is not what they want. They want Islamic Sheri law. So all of you with xxxdvds, videos, illegal drugs and so on, better hide than good or get ride of than, and don't forget about the liquor.

Answer 4

We should kill them, of course. But in order to help prevent another attack, it would be wise to find out what their reasoning is, even if it's irrational. If you know your enemy's motive, it's easier to defeat your enemy.

Yes, killing them upon being attacked makes sense, which is why I don't understand the decision to go into Iraq and not go after Osama bin Laden.

I can only guess that since 9/11 killed a lot of New Yorkers and NYC is mostly Democrat, GWB and his supporters don't care if Osama attacks them again. I can only guess that GWB and his supporters only wish to protect those who agree with them.

The liberals are all diseased traitors so who cares if they die, right? The conservatives on Yahoo are only patriotic and mad because their pride is hurt. They could care less about the people who died on 9/11 because the majority of them were liberal democrats.

Answer 5

If we were attacked we would have to blow their brains out. It is survival. If you would like to learn about their religion and culture read the Koran especially the section on Jihad. The first fifteen or twenty chapters are long and ordinary, however, as the section moves on it gets hotter and repugnant.

Answer 6

I think knowing your enemy is prudent so both sides of politics would do the same thing in that regard.
If you are talking about during an actual attack then obviously retaliation is necessary and both sides of politics would agree.
If you are talking about after an attack, well you need to know your enemy in order to find them....speaking of which why haven't they (the Republican Government) found Osama yet?
*

Answer 7

The only REASON why we got hit on 9-11 was because of our stance with Israel and our continued meddling in Middle Eastern affairs.

If and WHEN we get attacked again--it will be because we did it to ourselves--when we invaded Iraq on a pack of lies; spreading hatred, chaos, and disorder everywhere we went.

And allowing terrorists to get stronger--not WEAKER--as Bush claims.

Answer 8

If you were smart you would figure out as much as possible about them and what makes then tick. But that's if your smart, of course you wouldn't, that is why all successful wars have hinged on lack of intelligence, intelligence is so over rated why bother to learn anything. just start shooting in all directions your bound to hit someone sooner or later. and they must be guilty of something after all they got shot didn't they, no one would shoot then unless they were guilty.

So let me get this straight, to enforce rule of law you would use summery execution without trial. that ought to convince people that the power of the law is not to be trifled with, we just abandon it until a more convenient time. Good thinking!

Answer 9

Caught bomb in hand, the lib would give them a fair trial that takes into account childhood experiences, the fact that their mother wanted a girl and other extremely important extenuating circumstances, the possibility of parole and time off for good behavior.

Caught bomb in hand, the Republican would save taxpayer dollars by settling the matter right there.

Answer 10

The liberals showed you what they would do by the first two answers you got. They would compliment the terrorists for being so dedicated, insult you on your grammar and the apologize to the entire nation of Islam on behalf of America.



A Conservative would hunt them down and kill them and their families which is exactly what needs to be done.