2007-08-11 13:54:44 · 25 answers · asked by cave man 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Hawk maybe you need to check Bush's approval rating which is down to about 25% now and contiunally dropping. If you can't see any laws he's broken or his lies then you are walking through life with blinders on. Your statement makes you seem ignorant and uneducated.
2007-08-13 13:50:36 · update #1
There would have never been a 911 disaster if Bush had not stolen the election from Gore. It is as simple as that.
2007-08-13 14:01:47 · update #2
yes - he has done more damage then any other president and has put our country at great risk financially as well as making us a target for the rest of the world.
he has stripped our constitution - there are many more before him that have paved the way for what he has done - but he gets the prize for being the one to fully pull off the destruction of america.
there will be others that follow and will not give up the powers he has aquired - the only thing we have going for us is no one pays attention to him - he is a joke - a bad joke.
2007-08-11 15:15:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Your view is only slanted by the bombardment of the lies of the media. The reason we had 911 is because Clinton was such a wimp with his pants around his ankles and his ____ where it doesn't belong.
The truth of the matter is that we haven't had another episode even close to 911 since President Bush has taken action against the terrorists.
2007-08-11 23:40:16 · answer #2 · answered by Free Thinker 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no
There have been worse, although he might be considered one of the slowest-witted in my opinion
His intentions are shady, his administrations' scandals are pushed aside, and his cover-ups are many.
But just because we're witnessing for ourselves his blatant mistakes doesn't give us the right to see him as our worst president.
Did you know that Bush talks in Haikus a lot? How poetic!
Warren Harding is listed (in the link) as one of the worst, but I'll have to say Fillmore is our most useless President
Anyway, my point here is that if Bush was really that bad, he wouldn't have been re-elected. And people would riot against him and his administration would be overthrown. Sure, there have been small protests against the war in Iraq (Shouldn't there be a war on terror somewhere? hmm....), gas prices, global warming (the latter two aren't really his fault even if he's doing nothing against it). But it's nothing that no president has ever come across.
2007-08-11 21:53:02 · answer #3 · answered by QQaid 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Let's see, he guided us through 911, destroyed the Taliban regime in Afghanistan, destroyed Saddam's regime (which was the only country in the world to applaud the 911 attacks). The economy has been very strong, unemployment is low.
20 Years from now Bush will at the very least be considered a strong president. Maybe not one of the best, but certainly not as bad as many of the hyper-liberals would try and make you believe.
2007-08-11 21:06:15 · answer #4 · answered by Dan 2 · 6⤊ 3⤋
No, he is close, but he is not the worst. Woodrow Wilson was the worst. Two words, Federal Reserve!
"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." -Woodrow Wilson, after signing the Federal Reserve into existence
2007-08-11 21:42:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anthony M 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Well, I think that he would certainly be in the running, but I am not really sure what some of the others have done.
But if you take into account, the war, the ability to adapt, the energy situation, the environmental stances, the education policies (Test, test, and more test), the gov. response initially to Katrina, and the ongoing problems there, and his leadership and views on immigration, his anti-science type of stance on stem cell research, and his overall handling of world policy, etc.
I think that he might actually be the worst president in American History.
I think most prudent Americans will be glad when he has left office.
2007-08-11 21:10:49 · answer #6 · answered by madcat 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Depends, In some aspects yes some no. Its a matter of personel belifes. I liked him for a while now i dont. Do i think hes the worst? Personally no. I have seen worst.
2007-08-11 21:03:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No.
There have been worse presidents. During the 1800s, and I still count Nixon as worse than Bush.
Bush means well -- he just can't seem to understand the concept that he is not allowed to break the law. And he actually doesn't seem to understand the constitutional damage he's doing.
But others in the past have done intentionally what Bush is doing by negligence -- so he's not the worst.
2007-08-11 20:59:35 · answer #8 · answered by coragryph 7 · 3⤊ 6⤋
No, you have not seen anything yet, you just wait to the end of this next batch goes that's going in, I hope we survive.
-- If Bush could run this time, he would get my vote.
2007-08-11 21:17:28 · answer #9 · answered by Auburn 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Maybe not the worse, but definitely the dumbest. Him and Reagan, and Nixon run a tight race for the worse.
2007-08-11 21:07:44 · answer #10 · answered by Spirited Virgo 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋